2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-020-0248-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental neural network enhanced quantum tomography

Abstract: Quantum tomography is currently ubiquitous for testing any implementation of a quantum information processing device. Various sophisticated procedures for state and process reconstruction from measured data are well developed and benefit from precise knowledge of the model describing state preparation and the measurement apparatus. However, physical models suffer from intrinsic limitations as actual measurement operators and trial states cannot be known precisely. This scenario inevitably leads to state-prepar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the neural network will, based on the training examples, find by itself an internal representation of the underlying regression problem. We remark that such a setting, inferring the quantum state from the time evolution of observables, is very different from recent works using neural networks for quantum state tomography of systems of many qubits [23][24][25][26], or for filtering experimental data before performing quantum state tomography [27].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Instead, the neural network will, based on the training examples, find by itself an internal representation of the underlying regression problem. We remark that such a setting, inferring the quantum state from the time evolution of observables, is very different from recent works using neural networks for quantum state tomography of systems of many qubits [23][24][25][26], or for filtering experimental data before performing quantum state tomography [27].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Very recently, the method was used in application to an experimental Rydberg-atom simulator with eight and nine atoms, using a pure-state, constant-phase approximation and measurements in a single basis [29]. Neural network techniques in the context of QST were also employed, albeit in a very different setting, to pre-process the data, thereby reducing the effect of state preparation and measurement errors [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22–27 ] Recently, ML algorithms have also been applied to quantum photonics. [ 28–34 ] Combining the Bayesian phase estimation with Hamiltonian Learning techniques for analyzing large datasets from nitrogen vacancy (NV) centers in bulk diamond allowed for magnetic field measurements with extreme sensitivity at room temperature. [ 35 ] Hamiltonian Learning was adopted for the characterization of different quantum systems, [ 36 ] including the characterization of electron spin states in diamond NV centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%