2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental mutation-accumulation on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster reveals stronger selection on males than females

Abstract: BackgroundSex differences in the magnitude or direction of mutational effect may be important to a variety of population processes, shaping the mutation load and affecting the cost of sex itself. These differences are expected to be greatest after sexual maturity. Mutation-accumulation (MA) experiments provide the most direct way to examine the consequences of new mutations, but most studies have focused on juvenile viability without regard to sex, and on autosomes rather than sex chromosomes; both adult fitne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
90
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For lifespan, the picture is complicated by the fact that autosomal variation is larger in males. Why males show more variation than females in general is not obvious, but could be related to deleterious mutations having a generally larger effect on fitness in males (Mallet et al 2011; Sharp and Agrawal 2013), and thus generate more variation in this sex. If this effect carries over to traits closely connected to fitness, such as lifespan, this could potentially generate more variation for lifespan in males than females ( e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lifespan, the picture is complicated by the fact that autosomal variation is larger in males. Why males show more variation than females in general is not obvious, but could be related to deleterious mutations having a generally larger effect on fitness in males (Mallet et al 2011; Sharp and Agrawal 2013), and thus generate more variation in this sex. If this effect carries over to traits closely connected to fitness, such as lifespan, this could potentially generate more variation for lifespan in males than females ( e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the results for detrimental mutations have been rather discordant, even for D. melanogaster (Halligan and Keightley 2009;Mallet et al 2011Mallet et al , 2012. Overall, there is evidence in this species for a detectable DM for fitness (equal to Us ) of 1-2%.…”
Section: The Properties Of Deleterious Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Within this framework, numerous studies have tested the efficacy of sexual selection in aiding adaptation by modifying the strength of sexual selection to study evolutionary responses from standing genetic variation (e.g., Holland and Rice 1999;Holland 2002;Martin and Hosken 2003;Rundle et al 2006;Fricke and Arnqvist 2007;Morrow et al 2008;Jarzebowska and Radwan 2010;Maklakov et al 2010;Plesnar-Bielak et al 2012;Chenoweth et al 2015;Lumley et al 2015) or purging naturally accumulated (e.g., Radwan et al 2004;Rundle et al 2006;Mallet et al 2011;McGuigan et al 2011;Sharp and Agrawal 2013) or artificially induced/introduced deleterious mutations (e.g., Radwan 2004;Sharp and Agrawal 2008;Hollis and Houle 2011;Plesnar et al 2011;Arbuthnott and Rundle 2012;Clark et al 2012;Almbro and Simmons 2013;Power and Holman 2015;Grieshop et al 2016). The results of these studies have been inconsistent, which allows several insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%