1990
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760300208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental modeling of solvent‐casting thin polymer films

Abstract: An apparatus was designed and assembled to study the solvent removal from solution-cast thin polymer films. The computer interfacing of a thermogravimetric analyzer, spectrophotometer, electronic flowmeters, and control valves for the apparatus enabled the preprogramming of the carrier gas velocity, carrier gas solvent content, and temperature profiles to simulate the environment experienced in large parallel flow industrial driers. The apparatus has also been designed and operated to enable the visual observa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a glassy skin can form at the exposed surface. Since the molecular diffusion coefficient is smaller in the glassy region [1], [2], [3], the formation of such a skin slows desorption [7]. In extreme cases, trapping skinning can occur, and an increase in the driving force will decrease the total flux through the exposed surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a glassy skin can form at the exposed surface. Since the molecular diffusion coefficient is smaller in the glassy region [1], [2], [3], the formation of such a skin slows desorption [7]. In extreme cases, trapping skinning can occur, and an increase in the driving force will decrease the total flux through the exposed surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in n will increase F, as it should since we are increasing the diffusion coefficient. However, for fixed C,, an increase in k, which would normally increase the amount of penetrant desorbed, will actually decrease F. This embodies the very essence of trapping skinning (Cairncross and Durning, 1996;Powers and Collier, 1990).…”
Section: The Accumulated Fluxmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Trapping skinning is an anomalous special case of the skinning effect in which an increase in the force driving the desorption will actually decrease the accumulated flux through the boundary (Cairncross and Durning, 1996;Powers and Collier, 1990). Crank (1950) and Crank and Park (I95 I) showed that this behavior cannot be fully explained by the lower Fickian diffusion coefficient in the glassy region.…”
Section: A Edwardsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In trapping skinning, an increase in the force driving the desorption will actually decrease the accumulated flux through the boundary [3,11,[17][18][19]. These various anomalous features of the skinning process cannot be explained by simple Fickian diffusion, which postulates that the chemical potential of the system is a function only of the penetrant concentrationC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is physically reasonable, because here the leading order is O( −1/2 ). Since the skin is known to slow desorption [16,17], it is clear that the flux through the skin should be no larger than O(1). The last condition needed for our layer problem is a matching condition; we note from (3.3) that the appropriate one for our problem is…”
Section: Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%