2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental modal substructuring to couple and uncouple substructures with flexible fixtures and multi-point connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the condition numbers of these matrices indicate the condition of substructuring as pointed out in references [1] and [5] .…”
Section: Condition Of Substructuringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the condition numbers of these matrices indicate the condition of substructuring as pointed out in references [1] and [5] .…”
Section: Condition Of Substructuringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They range in complexity from model simplification to the complex where an experimental substructure is attached to the finite element substructure [13]. The work for this project uses three techniques for reducing the size of our model: Craig-Bampton formulation [6], model simplification, and a CMS technique for coupling experimental and analytical models known as the Modal Constraints for Fixtures Subsystems (MCFS) [2,3,13]. The focus of the paper is on the Craig-Bampton formulation, for it is the most widely known.…”
Section: Chapter 2 Surrogate Model Creation Techniques Used For Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any surrogate model will have a loss of fidelity due to the model reduction process. The reduced model can consist of many different submodels that have been reduced using potentially different techniques such as CraigBampton formulation [6], Craig-Chang formulation [7], proper orthogonal decomposition [10], or component mode synthesis (CMS) [2,4]; potentially, some submodels may not be reduced at all and consist of the original finite element (FE) mesh. The unreduced submodels may be where loads are applied or contain regions where uncertainty quantification is to be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main advantage of this method. Allen [8][9][10] and Mayes [11,12] presented several approaches about coupling the analytical model and some experimental issues related to FBS especially during the measurements of rotational degree of freedoms at the coupling. Neglecting the rotational degree of freedom will affect the FRF of the assembled system, as presented by Manzato recently in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate coupling type is presented for the investigation of the dynamic behaviour of the structure. Bolted joints have been chosen for this study as these joints are commonly used in most engineering application and are also used by modal analysts in their research related to FBS in [8,10,12]. For the dynamic substructuring model, the FRFs of the subsystems were derived based on the analytical model of the subsystems and are assembled together using rigid and elastic type of coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%