2011
DOI: 10.1080/17480930.2011.608883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental mineral carbonation: approaches to accelerate CO2sequestration in mine waste materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits that are favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile [63], nickel [64][65][66], chromium [67,68], diamond [69] and platinum group element (PGE) mines [70,71]. These mine types are abundant worldwide and their CO 2 storage potential is large [61].…”
Section: Suitable Mine For Mineral Carbonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits that are favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile [63], nickel [64][65][66], chromium [67,68], diamond [69] and platinum group element (PGE) mines [70,71]. These mine types are abundant worldwide and their CO 2 storage potential is large [61].…”
Section: Suitable Mine For Mineral Carbonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacobs and Hitch [145] conducted a mineral carbonation study to accelerate the carbonation of mine waste materials. Power et al [146] utilized a microbial method for mineral carbonation.…”
Section: Mining and Industrial Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of conversion to a carbonate product from 24% to 74% were achieved through the reduction of particle size from <2 mm to <38 µm in 30 min of reaction time (19 bar and 100 • C) [74]. Accordingly, the surface area can be increased by grinding or sieving, making the particle size smaller but with more available surface area for the reaction to occur; this is also known as mechanical activation [24]. Although the uptake capacity obtained through this experiment was quite low, the results were comparable to that of using a high-energy reactor (high pressure and high-temperature system).…”
Section: Influence Of Particle Size Fraction On Uptake Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCS transfers the captured carbon dioxide to a chosen storage area for a long period of time, while CCU converts the captured carbon dioxide into a value-added product that can bring revenue to various sectors, such as bendable concrete, methane, urea and fuels [7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Out of these potential CCS and CCU technologies, mineral carbonation has been suggested as an ideal approach where the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can be stored and kept permanently as a stable and non-toxic carbonate product that can further be used and commercialized (e.g., partial cement replacement, brick production, paint and many more possibilities) [23][24][25]. This shows that mineral carbonation can act as a useful approach for both CCS and CCU, but the latter seems more promising, as it offers additional revenue in addition to removing carbon dioxide from the air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%