2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.05.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurements of thermal conductivity of engine oil-based hybrid and mono nanofluids with tungsten oxide (WO3) and MWCNTs inclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concluded the maximum absolute value with 0.0095 error and 1.6684e-05 train performance. Soltani et al (2020) were investigated the experimental analysis to measure the WO3-MWCNTs/Engine Oil thermal conductivity and establishing a new significance. The hybrid nanofluid thermal conductivity was increased by 19.85% compared to the base fluid at T = 60 °C and ϕ = 0.6%.…”
Section: Frontiers In Heat and Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded the maximum absolute value with 0.0095 error and 1.6684e-05 train performance. Soltani et al (2020) were investigated the experimental analysis to measure the WO3-MWCNTs/Engine Oil thermal conductivity and establishing a new significance. The hybrid nanofluid thermal conductivity was increased by 19.85% compared to the base fluid at T = 60 °C and ϕ = 0.6%.…”
Section: Frontiers In Heat and Mass Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have reported that for a given Reynolds number, the nanofluid containing 2 vol.% Cu nanoparticles had greater (by 60%) convective heat transfer coefficient in comparison to pure water. Additionally, in several investigations it has been shown that the nanofluids possessing low amount of nanoparticles can have 10% higher thermal conductivity [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In another research, Naphon [21] thermal conductivity of the fluid containing only 0.3 vol.% Cu nanoparticles was increased by about 40% which is significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many solutions have been recommended by various researchers to reduce energy consumption (Ahmadi et al, 2017;Ahmad et al, 2018;Nwaji et al, 2019;Sarafraz et al, 2019;Azimi Fereidani et al, 2021;Nundy et al, 2021). Techniques include installing PCM (Ahangari and Maerefat, 2019;Lizana et al, 2019;Ziasistani and Fazelpour, 2019;Ben Romdhane et al, 2020;Miansari et al, 2020;Saxena et al, 2020), heat recovery (Liu et al, 2020;Shahsavar Goldanlou et al, 2020), using solar energy (Toghraie et al, 2018;Gagliano et al, 2019;Parsa et al, 2019;Gholipour et al, 2020;Menni et al, 2020;Parsa et al, 2020;Poon et al, 2020;Gholipour et al, 2021), other renewables such as wind (Jahangiri et al, 2019;Mostafaeipour et al, 2019;Kalbasi et al, 2021), geothermal sources (Kang et al, 2013;Palmero-Marrero et al, 2020) and finally using nanofluid (Kulkarni et al, 2009;Strandberg and Das, 2010;Moradi et al, 2019;Soltani et al, 2020;Mustafa et al, 2021). Considering the hot and dry climate, Li et al (2019) by conducting a numerical study examined the effect of adding RT-27 PCM to a wall with 20 cm thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%