2014
DOI: 10.1116/1.4901876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurements of telecentricity errors in high-numerical-aperture extreme ultraviolet mask images

Abstract: High sensitivity actinic detection of native defects on extreme ultraviolet lithography mask blanks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SHARP is a synchrotron-based, actinic, EUV mask microscope, located at a bending-magnet beamline at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Since its commissioning in 2013, SHARP has contributed to many aspects of EUV mask technology, including defects, 7 their detection 8 and printability, 9 repairs, 10 substrate roughness, 10 impact of non-telecentricity 11 and multilayer properties. 12 An overview of SHARP can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHARP is a synchrotron-based, actinic, EUV mask microscope, located at a bending-magnet beamline at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Since its commissioning in 2013, SHARP has contributed to many aspects of EUV mask technology, including defects, 7 their detection 8 and printability, 9 repairs, 10 substrate roughness, 10 impact of non-telecentricity 11 and multilayer properties. 12 An overview of SHARP can be found in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heightened attention to mask 3D effects has been driven in large measure by their increased significance at the dimensions of future generations of technology for which EUV lithography is expected to be used. Manifestations of mask 3D effects include dependence of the planes of best focus on pitch, 20 pattern shifts coupled to focus variations, 21 and image blurring. 22 Optimization of the source and mask to mitigate these effects involves a significantly more complex computational situation than encountered in optical lithography, where OPC computation times are already approaching unacceptable levels.…”
Section: Mitigation Of Mask 3d Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlay control will need to be 3.5 nm (3) and tighter. 31 Moreover, with EUV lithography there are sources of overlay error, such as mask non-flatness 32 and non-telecentricity, 21 that are not found in optical lithography, and the impact of aberrations on overlay will be greater for EUV than for optical lithography. 33 Focus control will need to be very tight for future generations of EUV lithography.…”
Section: Process Control For Euv Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pattern shifts through focus have been identified as manifestations of mask 3D effects. 19 Process-window OPC will need to include shifts of the center lines of features, not just edges individually. This sensitivity to focus, particularly when there may be different planes for best focus for different features, indicates that EUV lithography will require very tight focus control.…”
Section: Computational Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%