The 18th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics 2018
DOI: 10.3390/icem18-05364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Measurement of Pressure Loading from Near-Field Blast Events: Techniques, Findings and Future Challenges

Abstract: The accurate characterisation of pressure loads imposed on structural members following the detonation of a high explosive is critical to our ability to design protective systems. This poses serious challenges for experimentalists, due to the high magnitude and short duration of loading. If the distance from the detonation to the target is relatively large, the loading is imparted through the interaction of a shock wave travelling away from the detonation through the surrounding medium, say air. Here, pressure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a TNT equivalency value of 1.2 for PE4, the Hopkinson scaled distance (Z) values for the detonations above 10g are below 0.44 m/kg 1/3 . It is known that the (initially very hot) fireball continues to expand until it reaches Z of 1 m/kg 1/3 [31], so it is plausible the fireball is at sufficiently high temperature to mark the surface of the aluminium alloy witness plate for 0.31 m/kg 1/3 < Z < 0.44 m/kg 1/3 .…”
Section: Witness Plate Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a TNT equivalency value of 1.2 for PE4, the Hopkinson scaled distance (Z) values for the detonations above 10g are below 0.44 m/kg 1/3 . It is known that the (initially very hot) fireball continues to expand until it reaches Z of 1 m/kg 1/3 [31], so it is plausible the fireball is at sufficiently high temperature to mark the surface of the aluminium alloy witness plate for 0.31 m/kg 1/3 < Z < 0.44 m/kg 1/3 .…”
Section: Witness Plate Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, we will use the simplified Kingery and Bulmash model reported in [ 22 ], where each of the measured descriptors , and of blast waves are conveniently given for both side-on and reflected pressure measurement, and for hemispherical surface bursts and spherical airbursts. K&B data are a reference standard [ 7 ] and are used, for example, in the simulation software ConWep [ 23 ], in the LOAD_BLAST module of LS-DYNA [ 24 ] and in many research works (see, e.g., [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 20 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During an explosion, the measurement of the overpressure at the front of the generated blast wave by using pressure sensors is a standard and well-controlled technique (see, e.g., [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]). Assessing the magnitude of the overpressure peak is crucial to characterize explosives, because this magnitude can be used to derive a plethora of physical quantities at the blast wave front from the Rankine–Hugoniot relationships [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hopkinson-Cranz scaled distance, Z = R/W 1/3 (where R is the SOD from the charge to the target and W is the TNT equivalent charge mass) is a dimensional scaled distance. Explosions are considered 'near-field' for Z < 1 m/kg 1/3 , and in this region the blast pressure and impulse distribution is extremely nonuniform and fireball effects are significant (8) (9) (10). Spherical blast waves propagate in the axial and radial directions after the detonation of a cylindrical charge (9) (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%