1996
DOI: 10.1016/0925-8388(96)02329-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurement of pre-melting and melting of thorium dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
47
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
13
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the general trend of the entire actinide dioxide series, reported in Figure 8, 3,5,7,[28][29][30][31] changes considerably when new values for NpO 2 and PuO 2 are taken into account instead of old ones. Figure 8 also shows that the difference between old and new melting temperatures of actinide dioxides increases with the atomic number of the actinide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the general trend of the entire actinide dioxide series, reported in Figure 8, 3,5,7,[28][29][30][31] changes considerably when new values for NpO 2 and PuO 2 are taken into account instead of old ones. Figure 8 also shows that the difference between old and new melting temperatures of actinide dioxides increases with the atomic number of the actinide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between old (induction furnace heating in a tungsten crucible) 3,[29][30][31] and new (quasi-containerless laser heating) 5,7,28 data points for the melting/solidification temperatures of dioxides of the actinide series. Data for the dioxides of protactinium and trans-plutonium actinides are missing or considered as unreliable.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental value of the melting temperature of urania (3120±30 K (Adamson et al, 1985)) is lower than that evaluated as the most accurate (Bakker et al, 1997) value at exact stoichiometry (3651±17 K (Ronchi and Hiernaut, 1996)) and other evaluated melting temperatures between 3323 and 3663 K (Bakker et al, 1997). However as Table 1 shows the estimated melting temperature of thoria is lower than urania and it is underestimated by more than 300 K while for urania agreement is good for most functionals (except of PBE).…”
Section: Melting Temperaturementioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is widely discussed that thoria is not only four times more abundant but also that nuclear reactors based on thorium would be safe, with the risk of reactor core melt-down eliminated due not only to higher thermal conductivity but also a much higher fuel melting temperature: 3651±17 K (Ronchi and Hiernaut, 1996) versus 3120±30 K (Adamson et al, 1985) for urania. However it is seldom discussed that thoria does not oxidize to the higher oxidation states like urania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MD calculated changes in enthalpy (H(T)-H(300 K)) and density of Th0.9375U0.0625O2, Th0.875U0.125O2, Th0.8125U0.1875O2, Th0.75U0.25O2 and Th0.6875U0.3125O2 for both solid and liquid phases were fitted to equations (7)- (8) as well as (9)- (10) [7] argued that the curvature corrections made by other researchers on the ThO2 or UO2 rich sides of the temperature composition curve need not be the same, because the loss of 'O' from UO2 in the UO2-rich side might be different from that of the ThO2 rich side and hence recommended a value of 3643 ± 30 K. Ronchi et al [9] recently measured the melting temperature of ThO2 experimentally (under both stoichiometric and hypostoichiometric conditions) by heating a spherical sample with four symmetrically spaced pulsed Nd YAG lasers and observing the cooling/heating curve with time. For stoichiometric ThO2, the measured melting point was 3651 ± 17 K [9] and their data is consistent with the data generated by…”
Section: Enthalpy and Density Variation Of Th Rich (Thu)o2 And (Thpmentioning
confidence: 99%