2016
DOI: 10.1002/apj.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurement of flow distribution in a parallel mini‐channel fluidic network using PIV technique

Abstract: Fluid flow distribution among parallel channels usually play an important role on the global performance improvement of tubular process equipment, but remains difficult to be properly measured by experimental methods. This paper presents a systematic study on the measurement of flow distribution in a multi-channels fluidic network using PIV technique. For the precise measurement of flow-rate in each individual channel, standard 2D-2C PIV technique is used to obtain velocity vectors on multiple sampling planes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides numerical methods, existing experimental techniques for the evaluation of fluid distribution are limited to visualizations by color, pH indicator or fluorescence tracers [22][23][24]. Other intrusive experimental methods such as Hot Wire Probe (HWP), Doppler Ultrasonic Velocimetry (DUV) are compared by Boutin et al [25]. But the above-listed techniques give only single point measurement other than detailed flow distribution information.…”
Section: Existing Methods In Fluid Distribution Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides numerical methods, existing experimental techniques for the evaluation of fluid distribution are limited to visualizations by color, pH indicator or fluorescence tracers [22][23][24]. Other intrusive experimental methods such as Hot Wire Probe (HWP), Doppler Ultrasonic Velocimetry (DUV) are compared by Boutin et al [25]. But the above-listed techniques give only single point measurement other than detailed flow distribution information.…”
Section: Existing Methods In Fluid Distribution Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comes to millimetric device that have short residence time, this method is limited by the sampling rate of conductometer. PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) [25,27] and LIF (Laser Induced Fluorescence) [28] measurements provide quantitative velocity distribution inside certain flow configurations, but under specific conditions. First, the visualization is usually limited to simple or single-pipe devices but not adapted to 3D complex configurations.…”
Section: Existing Methods In Fluid Distribution Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our pre-test, two numbers of instantaneous frames, 200 and 375, were used for each plane to test the image independence. The maximum deviation is less than 0.1% (Boutin et al, 2016). Therefore, 200 pairs of frames for each plane were enough to save the experiment and post-processing time.…”
Section: Measurement Procedures and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum possible deviation is 5.1% which will be indicated as the error bar for PIV results in the following figures, implying that the PIV technique is relatively accurate for flow-rate distribution measurements among parallel channels. More details on the PIV measurement procedure may be found in our earlier work (Boutin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Measurement Procedures and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation