1954
DOI: 10.1037/h0055404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental manipulation of verbal behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The types of relational stimuli used varied from simple "encouragers" (Verplank, 1955) to nodding the head and saying "mmm" or "huh-uh" (Greenspoon, 1955;Haildum & Brown, 1956). Many researchers have replicated this effect (Cohen, Kalish, Thurston, & Cohen, 1954;Hildum & Brown, 1956;Rogers, 1960;Sapolsky, 1960;Salzinger & Pisioni, 1958, 1960Wilson & Verplank, 1956). Verbal statements of memories also proved susceptible to conditioning (Quay, 1959).…”
Section: The Grounding In Empirical Principlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The types of relational stimuli used varied from simple "encouragers" (Verplank, 1955) to nodding the head and saying "mmm" or "huh-uh" (Greenspoon, 1955;Haildum & Brown, 1956). Many researchers have replicated this effect (Cohen, Kalish, Thurston, & Cohen, 1954;Hildum & Brown, 1956;Rogers, 1960;Sapolsky, 1960;Salzinger & Pisioni, 1958, 1960Wilson & Verplank, 1956). Verbal statements of memories also proved susceptible to conditioning (Quay, 1959).…”
Section: The Grounding In Empirical Principlesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We know that, when attempting to avert an evil aimed at themselves, people naturally tend to err in favour of themselves, probably also of their compatriots, often exaggerating the danger or downplaying the evil involved in violating the relevant prohibition. 115 We know that when push comes to shove they will preserve themselves even at the expense of committing murder or torture. We do not want them to hear that they may be pardoned for doing so, because such knowledge will encourage them to act too swiftly in their own interest or those of their countrymen at intolerable expense to others.…”
Section: Admittedly the Distinction Between Justifications And Excusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartman (1955) reported that 11 Good 1 ' was effective only when used in conjunction with a strong response preference. Cohen et al (1954) reported that "Good" was effective, regardless of pronoun preference, with normals, whereas Cohen and Cohen (1960) found that it was ineffective with schizophrenies. However, other reports (Taffel, 1955; Buss and Gerjuoy, 1958) have indicated that the use of "Good" elicited reliable modifications in the verbal behaviour of psychiatrie patients (neurotics and psychotics).…”
Section: Verbal Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buss and Gerjuoy (1958) The factor of habit competition has been investigated in two complementary studies (Cohen, Kalish, Thurstone and Cohen, 1954;Cohen and Cohen, 1960). In the first study (Cohen et al, 1954) The second study (Cohen and Cohen., 1960) investigated verbal conditioning in 16 schizophrenies and 16 neurotics. Significant acquisition was reported for the neurotics but no effect was shown for the schizophrenie .…”
Section: Verbal Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%