2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01686-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental manipulation of microbiota reduces host thermal tolerance and fitness under heat stress in a vertebrate ectotherm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Santoro et al (2021) demonstrated that the stability of inoculated “beneficial microorganisms” in the coral Mussismilia hispida provided a thermal protection effect, reducing heat stress and preventing the associated mortality (40% increase in the survival rate) of the hosts. Contrary, disruptions in the microbiome structure and function can lead to a weakened thermal tolerance and performance of the host, and a decrease in survival rate under prolonged heat stress condition, particularly in early ontogenetic stages such as in the tadpoles of the green frog Lithobates clamitans (Fontaine et al, 2022). Overall, regardless of the mechanisms, the temporal stability in the microbiome structure and function found in this study may imply a fundamental ecological role for I. nucleus survival in the thermally extreme tropical intertidal environment (Bang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Santoro et al (2021) demonstrated that the stability of inoculated “beneficial microorganisms” in the coral Mussismilia hispida provided a thermal protection effect, reducing heat stress and preventing the associated mortality (40% increase in the survival rate) of the hosts. Contrary, disruptions in the microbiome structure and function can lead to a weakened thermal tolerance and performance of the host, and a decrease in survival rate under prolonged heat stress condition, particularly in early ontogenetic stages such as in the tadpoles of the green frog Lithobates clamitans (Fontaine et al, 2022). Overall, regardless of the mechanisms, the temporal stability in the microbiome structure and function found in this study may imply a fundamental ecological role for I. nucleus survival in the thermally extreme tropical intertidal environment (Bang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, food is not always plentiful in natural habitats; therefore, warming may negatively affect the fitness of individuals and even populations while maintaining high metabolic rates (e.g., Bestion et al, 2015;Hao et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2022). In contrast, although the metabolism of T. amurensis in the semi-closed habitat was inhibited when the ambient temperature increased (Figure 2D), gut microbiota could assist energic regulation via composition change, which was probably beneficial for the proliferation of microbiota, which in turn assisted the thermal responses of the host (e.g., Seebacher et al, 2014;Fontaine et al, 2022). However, to comprehensively understand this complementary effect, further experimental manipulations are required to confirm the detailed regulation (e.g., Fontaine et al, 2022).…”
Section: Warming Climate Benefit On Gut Microbiota In Both Lizard Spe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the gut microbiota has been shown to benefit the host thermoregulation, immunity, metabolism, growth, development, and even social behaviors (e.g., Macke et al, 2017 ; Zhang and Wang, 2022 ), all of which can in turn regulate responses to warming temperatures (e.g., Kearney et al, 2010 ; Triggs and Knell, 2012 ; Montoya-Ciriaco et al, 2020 ). For example, the gut microbiota of tadpoles that experienced 3-week high temperatures (28°C) could modify the metabolism and enhance the heat tolerance of tadpoles ( Fontaine et al, 2022 ). Therefore, how gut microbiota affects the physiological responses of the host to climate warming is complex and still largely controversial ( Bestion et al, 2017 ; Bestion and Cote, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one extraordinary example, the host plant's heat tolerance is dependent on both a fungal endophyte and a virus that infects the fungus (Márquez et al 2007). The gut microbiota increased heat tolerance of fruit flies (Jaramillo and Castañeda 2021) and tadpoles (Fontaine et al 2022), and the symbionts of corals increased the thermal tolerance of holobionts (Berkelmans andvan Oppen 2006, Pelosi et al 2021). While the mechanisms of these interactions are not well understood, they alter high-temperature tolerance in a manner consistent with resource change: deprivation reducing Tmax in the case of parasites/pathogens (due to reallocation towards combating infection) and supply increasing Tmax in the case of mutualists.…”
Section: The Dependence Of Tpcs On Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%