2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.010505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Low-Latency Device-Independent Quantum Randomness

Abstract: Applications of randomness such as private key generation and public randomness beacons require small blocks of certified random bits on demand. Device-independent quantum random number generators can produce such random bits, but existing quantum-proof protocols and loophole-free implementations suffer from high latency, requiring many hours to produce any random bits. We demonstrate device-independent quantum randomness generation from a loophole-free Bell test with a more efficient quantum-proof protocol, o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the constructed QEF for the trial model C 222 (ABXY ) with uniformly random inputs is well-performing in the sense that it performs as well as the optimal PEF used for the classical trial model T (ABXY ). We emphasize that when the input distribution is close to uniform, the QEF derived from a PEF performs as well as the original PEF as demonstrated below and in our companion work [43]. However, when the input distribution is far away from uniform (for example, when the total-variation distance between the input and uniform distributions is larger than 0.7) and when the power β is small enough (for example, when β is smaller than 10 −7 ), we observed that the certified upper bound f max,ub could be larger than 1 by a non-negligible amount such that the QEF derived from a PEF does not perform as well as the original PEF.…”
Section: B Finite-data Performance Of Qefssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore the constructed QEF for the trial model C 222 (ABXY ) with uniformly random inputs is well-performing in the sense that it performs as well as the optimal PEF used for the classical trial model T (ABXY ). We emphasize that when the input distribution is close to uniform, the QEF derived from a PEF performs as well as the original PEF as demonstrated below and in our companion work [43]. However, when the input distribution is far away from uniform (for example, when the total-variation distance between the input and uniform distributions is larger than 0.7) and when the power β is small enough (for example, when β is smaller than 10 −7 ), we observed that the certified upper bound f max,ub could be larger than 1 by a non-negligible amount such that the QEF derived from a PEF does not perform as well as the original PEF.…”
Section: B Finite-data Performance Of Qefssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In this work, we develop quantum probability estimation to yield DIRG protocols with unsurpassed finite-data efficiency and with respect to quantum side information. This enables a practical device-independent randomness beacon where a block of 512 device-independent random bits is generated with an average experiment time of less than 5 min and with certified error bounded by 2 −64 , see our companion experimental work [43]. Our work also enables the realization of device-independent randomness expansion in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ 48–50 ] So far, only a few experiments succeeded in realizing a loophole‐free violation of Bell inequalities and even further fully DI quantum information processing tasks. [ 51–60 ] Besides, not all entangled states can violate a Bell inequality. [ 61,62 ] Therefore, the entangled states that violate no Bell inequalities cannot be witnessed in a DI manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%