1966
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/116.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Leptospirosis in Pregnant Sows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of leptospiras from the kidney tubules soon after commencement of leptospiruria was associated with a much more rapid decrease in serum agglutinating antibody titre than that observed in the untreated control animals, or in an animal treated at a later stage in the disease. This supports the hypothesis (Fennestad 1963) that leptospiras in the kidney tubules continue to stimulate antibody production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Removal of leptospiras from the kidney tubules soon after commencement of leptospiruria was associated with a much more rapid decrease in serum agglutinating antibody titre than that observed in the untreated control animals, or in an animal treated at a later stage in the disease. This supports the hypothesis (Fennestad 1963) that leptospiras in the kidney tubules continue to stimulate antibody production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nervig, Ellinghausen and Cardella (1978) infected calves with serovar szwajizak, another member of the Hebdomadis serogroup, and reported that all had overt clinical signs and leptospiraemia, but only 2 of 3 calves developed detectable MA antibody titres to the infecting serovar. Fennestad (1963) inoculated 6 young calves subcutaneously with sejroe, another closely related serovar, and produced mild disease with fever in 5 3-week-old calves and severe disease in a 2-day-old calf. Leptospiruria, moderate serological responses and interstitial nephritis were reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA sample amplification was done in 500 µL microtubes, with a 50 µL final volume. The reaction mixture consisted of 18.7 µL ultrapure water, 5.0 µL 10x reaction buffer (500 mM KCl; 15 mM MgCl2; 100 mM tris-HCl, pH 9.0), 8 The amplification cycle used was the one recommended by Mérien et al (19), added with an initial step at 94ºC for 5 minutes. Visualization of the amplified product (330 base pairs) was done by electrophoresis in a 2.0% (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, using TBE 0.5 X (0.04 M tris-acetate and 0.001M EDTA, pH 8.0) as running buffer.…”
Section: Polimerase Chain Reaction (Pcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guida et al The pathogenesis of the reproductive disease is poorly understood, but some authors believe that transplacental infection, occurring during a very limited period of maternal leptospiremia, is the sole cause (4). The isolation of leptospires from aborted fetuses, stillbirths and weak piglets was obtained in several occasions (5,8,27), however, the bacteria was never detected in apparently healthy piglets born from apparently healthy infected dams. Although organisms belonging to the Canicola serogroup have been recovered from swine in several countries (4), little is known on the epidemiology of serovar Canicola infection in pigs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%