1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-1811(98)84049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental leishmania major infection in mice: The role of IL-10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28,29 IFN-g is important in mediating the Th1 response, 30 whereas IL-10 and its receptor have been implicated in the Th2 response, although its specific involvement in the response to L. major is controversial. 31,32 IL-10 has recently been shown to be required for the persistence of parasites in mice after cure of visible disease. 33 Although the IL-10Ra chain gene localises to proximal chromosome 9, it is not included in the lmr2 congenic interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 IFN-g is important in mediating the Th1 response, 30 whereas IL-10 and its receptor have been implicated in the Th2 response, although its specific involvement in the response to L. major is controversial. 31,32 IL-10 has recently been shown to be required for the persistence of parasites in mice after cure of visible disease. 33 Although the IL-10Ra chain gene localises to proximal chromosome 9, it is not included in the lmr2 congenic interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data might be an apparent contradiction to the fact that these animals controlled the infection. However, Chatelain et al [24] reported that L. major susceptible mice treated with mAb to IL-10 did not control the infection. Moreover, the increase in IL-10 production by the cells obtained from mAb-treated animals may explain why these animals, even producing high levels of IFN-+ , had a reduction in iNOS activity in the macrophages, since there is evidence that IL-10 inhibits the iNOS induction in this cell type [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protective immunity would be associated with Th1 cells that produce INF-␥ and IL-2, whereas Th2 cells, which produce immunosuppressive IL-4 and IL-10, could facilitate the survival and dissemination of the parasite generating tissue damage and the appearance of the disease. Recent evidence [61][62][63] suggests an important role for IL-10, but not for IL-4 in the Th2 response. However, as has been proposed by others, [64][65][66][67] we analyzed IL-4 and IFN-␥ as indicators of Th2 and Th1, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%