2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations on the performance of a new design of foaming agent adding device used for dust control in underground coal mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the outlet pressure P 2 of the double-stage parallel adding equipment increases, causing the pressure loss (P 1 − P 2 ) to decline. This characteristic is just what the parallel-type device, proposed by Wang [6], does not have. The third one is that adding proportion q * of the double stage is reduced concluded from Sect.…”
Section: Relationship Between Pressure Loss ( P) and Watermentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the outlet pressure P 2 of the double-stage parallel adding equipment increases, causing the pressure loss (P 1 − P 2 ) to decline. This characteristic is just what the parallel-type device, proposed by Wang [6], does not have. The third one is that adding proportion q * of the double stage is reduced concluded from Sect.…”
Section: Relationship Between Pressure Loss ( P) and Watermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Lots of scholars and research institutions have studied on this technology [4,5]. However, the further development and application of DSF were severely restricted due to the high adding proportion of foaming agent and system complexity in past decades [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although airatomizing sprays are reported to be the most effective in airborne dust capture, their utilization is limited due to high maintenance requirements [7]. More recently, Wang, et al [11][12] have stated that foam technology is more efficient than water spraying for dust control in coal mines because it distributes moisture much more evenly over a large contact area on dust particles, improving the wetting and adhesion ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%