2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on the permeability of a hydrate-bearing reservoir considering overburden pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore size formed between aggregate structures is much larger than that of soil particles, which provides an ideal channel for gas phase fluid, thus increasing the permeability. Gao et al found that the presence of free water was not favorable to the permeability of the reservoir, 49,50 but no free water flow was detected during the measurement in this experiment, indicating that the water contained in the sample was not free water. It can also be seen in Figure 5 that the linear relationship between initial water saturation and initial permeability in the early stage is not obvious, and there are two possible explanations: one was that the amount of bound water in the sample was relatively small and the phenomenon of clusters was not obvious; the other was that the pore structure inside the sample was not controllable although the porosity of the sample was the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The pore size formed between aggregate structures is much larger than that of soil particles, which provides an ideal channel for gas phase fluid, thus increasing the permeability. Gao et al found that the presence of free water was not favorable to the permeability of the reservoir, 49,50 but no free water flow was detected during the measurement in this experiment, indicating that the water contained in the sample was not free water. It can also be seen in Figure 5 that the linear relationship between initial water saturation and initial permeability in the early stage is not obvious, and there are two possible explanations: one was that the amount of bound water in the sample was relatively small and the phenomenon of clusters was not obvious; the other was that the pore structure inside the sample was not controllable although the porosity of the sample was the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…With increasing ECP, the microfractures in the sample would preferentially close, resulting in a significant decrease in porosity and permeability. At larger ECP values, the microfractures and pore throats of the rock are already considerably compressed and so as the ECP increases further, there is a slower decrease in porosity and permeability 24,25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At larger ECP values, the microfractures and pore throats of the rock are already considerably compressed and so as the ECP increases further, there is a slower decrease in porosity and permeability. 24,25…”
Section: Core Flooding Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling the hydrate formation process, the permeability of the model was calculated under different hydrate saturations and compared with results from other studies, ,− as shown in Figure . When there was no hydrate generated in the throats (saturation of 0), the flow channels were unobstructed, and the pressure difference between inlet and outlet was so small that it was even close to the accuracy limits of the pressure gauge.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%