48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation on the Influence of Yaw Angle on the Inlet Performance at Mach 7

Abstract: This paper presents the results of an extensive measurement campaign that was conducted with an two-dimensional hypersonic inlet in the Hypersonic Windtunnel H2K at the German Aerospace Center in Cologne in order to study the effects of angle of yaw on the inlet performance. Both the external and internal flow paths of the inlet have been analyzed. Conducted measurements include static and Pitot pressure measurements, shadowgraph imagery, IR-thermography, Mach number and mass flow measurements. To simulate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted here, that this can impact the results, as previous investigations showed that hysteresis effects can influence the results [49]. As Figure 17 shows, the total pressure losses are strongly increased by the angle of yaw, as the sidewall shock on the luv-ward side becomes much stronger.…”
Section: Angle Of Yawmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted here, that this can impact the results, as previous investigations showed that hysteresis effects can influence the results [49]. As Figure 17 shows, the total pressure losses are strongly increased by the angle of yaw, as the sidewall shock on the luv-ward side becomes much stronger.…”
Section: Angle Of Yawmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For the vertical profiles, accuracy is much lower, as the pressure values have to be interpolated between the nearest pressure probes. Assuming a 10% variation of the static pressure at a Pitot tube from the interpolated value, it gives an accuracy of around ±6% for the Mach number determination [49]. For those experiments, where an angle of yaw was applied, the flowfield naturally is not symmetrical anymore, and the pressures had to be interpolated for the horizontal profiles as well, with the consequent reduced accuracy.…”
Section: A Pressure Measurements and Calculation Of Mach-numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The summaries of calculative results for GK01 model are displayed in Figure 1, where the experimental data is chosen from Hohn and Gulhan. 26 The comparison results between five turbulence models can be seen in Figure 1 The grid sensitivity has also been performed. Here, the turbulence model was specified as the SST k-o model which has been proved that it can predict the flowfield with high accuracy.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Liou and Benson 18 presented optimization results of bleeding system for supersonic inlet. Chang and Fan 19 studied the effect of the bleeding on the unstart/restart characteristics, and the effects of bleeding on the performance parameter was taken into consideration as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in a few studies the pressure and heat transfer coefficient distributions within an air-inlet were investigated [6,8,14,21]. Some additional possibilities for studying the heat transfer and the flow structure within an air-inlet appeared thanks to the application of panoramic investigation methods based on the use of luminescent coatings and transparent air-inlet walls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%