2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on the effects of compression ratio on in-cylinder combustion process and performance improvement of liquefied methane engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum torque produced at 5089 rpm for high compression piston was 9.6 Nm while for the low compression piston was 8.98 Nm. The results are similar to what is reported in previous research where high compression produced high power [17,[22][23][24]. The result also shows that the high thermal efficiency piston of 50% has higher torque and horsepower compared to lower thermal efficiency piston at 46%.…”
Section: Power and Torque For Low And High Compression Pistonsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum torque produced at 5089 rpm for high compression piston was 9.6 Nm while for the low compression piston was 8.98 Nm. The results are similar to what is reported in previous research where high compression produced high power [17,[22][23][24]. The result also shows that the high thermal efficiency piston of 50% has higher torque and horsepower compared to lower thermal efficiency piston at 46%.…”
Section: Power and Torque For Low And High Compression Pistonsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Fu et al [22] in his experiment found that the torque and thermal efficiency of LME ( liquefied Methane Engine ) could be improved by increasing the compression ratio. Under the operating conditions, the torque of LME could be increased by 9.5%.…”
Section: Compression Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this operating condition, the ignition delays of both fuels are again the same ( Figure 8). However, the laminar flame speeds of both fuels show different behavior under high pressure and temperature [9,25]. Consequently, during the combustion process, both fuels could be faster or slower than each other.…”
Section: Combustion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric efficiency decreases due to the CNG injected into intake port in the gas phase. CNG engine can be operated without knock by higher compression ratios [9]. Therefore, it is possible to compensate the power decrease by increasing the compression ratio [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%