“…After reflood no further mechanisms for fuel damage are expected: therefore nuclear fuel performance during LBLOCA is depicted hereafter by considering a list of physical processes causing degradation or rupture of fuel pins, namely occurring at high temperature and low coolant pressure: H2 production following the Zircaloy-water chemical reaction discussed in section 3.3. Ballooning of a few or of several rods,Ammirabile & Walker, 2014: this causes obstruction to the coolant channels and interacts with QF progression. Burst (following ballooning) and fission gas release,Pontillon et al, 2001: the burst, following fuel fragmentation and relocation (see below) may cause release of long lived solid fission products into the coolant in addition to non-condensable gases. Fuel relocation,Kim et al, 2017, into the ballooned region which causes increase in local decay power production. This is preceded, depending upon burn-up, by fuel fragmentation (or even pulverization), Brankov, 2017, see alsoBianco et al, 2015. During the last two decades experimental research brought to better understanding of nuclear fuel weaknesses following in-core operation: high burnup is mainly concerned although"…fragmentation appears to almost always occur, regardless of burnup …" (reference is made here to the current US licensing limit of 62 MWd/Ton U), Raynaud, 2012. The weaknesses can be classified into three broad categories, synthesized by D'Auria et al, 2019: (a) Pellet Clad Mechanical and Chemical Interaction (PCMI and PCCI), noticeably involving fuel swelling and cracking associated with core power ramps and reactivity excursions, e.g.…”