2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.05.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of FFF parts using different materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is explained by the same effect: for lower layer thicknesses, the lower deformation is caused by the greater cohesion between the layers, and in higher layer heights, it is the opposite; this is presumably caused by the lower density of the part due When examining the fracture images of the tested specimens, a brittle fracture pattern is evident in PETG (Figure 13a), representing a failure caused by the individual filament failures within the specimen. This characteristic failure mode is distinctive in Additive Manufacturing [37][38][39][40]. However, in the case of the reinforced specimen, a more ductile failure is observed (Figure 13b), clearly influenced by the movement of the reinforcements within the material matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is explained by the same effect: for lower layer thicknesses, the lower deformation is caused by the greater cohesion between the layers, and in higher layer heights, it is the opposite; this is presumably caused by the lower density of the part due When examining the fracture images of the tested specimens, a brittle fracture pattern is evident in PETG (Figure 13a), representing a failure caused by the individual filament failures within the specimen. This characteristic failure mode is distinctive in Additive Manufacturing [37][38][39][40]. However, in the case of the reinforced specimen, a more ductile failure is observed (Figure 13b), clearly influenced by the movement of the reinforcements within the material matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When examining the fracture images of the tested specimens, a brittle fracture pattern is evident in PETG (Figure 13a), representing a failure caused by the individual filament failures within the specimen. This characteristic failure mode is distinctive in Additive Manufacturing [37][38][39][40]. However, in the case of the reinforced specimen, a more ductile failure is observed (Figure 13b), clearly influenced by the movement of the reinforcements within the material matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Variation in the used materials is also influencing the mechanical properties and therefore is element that researchers are exploring. Djokikj et al [3] compared three different polymers (PC -polycarbonate, PETG -polyethylene terephthalate glycol, PLA -polylactic acid) in their studies. According to their results, PC specimens have the highest values for the UTS (ultimate tensile stress), right before PLA and PETG specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%