2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of vortex breakdown in a coaxial swirling jet with a density difference

Abstract: c We studied a stable vortex breakdown in a variable-property coaxial swirling jet. c A model using common nondimensional numbers is proposed to explain the following. c The height of the stagnation point increases with increasing outer jet velocity. c The height of the stagnation point is always lower for a denser inner jet. c The model is fairly successful in explaining the trends observed in our study. a r t i c l e i n f o t r a c tIn this work we experimentally investigate the behavior of stable vortex b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2015), figures 4 and 5 in Tammisola & Juniper (2016), figure C.8 in Falese et al. (2014), figures 3 and 4 in Jiang & Shen (1994), figure 5 in Adzlan & Gotoda (2012) and figure 5 in Apte et al. (2003) show flow states with features resembling CVB, although further investigation is required to confirm if these flow states are the CVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2015), figures 4 and 5 in Tammisola & Juniper (2016), figure C.8 in Falese et al. (2014), figures 3 and 4 in Jiang & Shen (1994), figure 5 in Adzlan & Gotoda (2012) and figure 5 in Apte et al. (2003) show flow states with features resembling CVB, although further investigation is required to confirm if these flow states are the CVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, the cases shown in figure 17 strongly resemble that shown in figure 5(b) of Liang & Maxworthy (2005) even though the Reynolds numbers in that study is only half of the value used here. Similarly, figure 45 in Syred & Beer (1974), figure 7 in Gore & Ranz (1964), figure 3 in Aguilar et al (2015), figures 4 and 5 in Tammisola & Juniper (2016), figure C.8 in Falese et al (2014), figures 3 and 4 in Jiang & Shen (1994), figure 5 in Adzlan & Gotoda (2012) and figure 5 in Apte et al (2003) show flow states with features resembling CVB, although further investigation is required to confirm if these flow states are the CVB.…”
Section: The Conical Form Of Vortex Breakdownmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is interest, therefore, in characterizing effects of varying density on vortex breakdown of laminar jets, extending the previous constant-density analyses to gas-jet configurations with jet-to-ambient density ratios that differ from unity. Such effects were investigated experimentally by Adzlan & Gotoda (2012) for a coaxial configuration involving either an air jet or a carbon dioxide jet, both discharging into an air coflow. The experiments revealed that the heavier carbon dioxide jet exhibits a greater degree of flow divergence and lower critical swirl numbers than the air jet, and that augmenting the coflow velocity decreases the flow divergence and tends to suppress vortex breakdown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work employs theoretical and numerical techniques to study vortex breakdown in variable-density laminar swirling jets. Unlike the experimental analysis by Adzlan & Gotoda (2012), our work addresses a wide range of jet-to-ambient density differences and provides a systematic approach to identifying the onset of both forms of breakdown, which has not previously been done. To test the methods and investigate possible quantitative differences from the results published previously for constant-density swirling jets, the flow conditions considered include, in particular, those of the previous numerical investigations (Ruith, Chen & Meiburg 2004;Moise & Mathew 2019;Moise 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iyogun et al [7] used PIV approach to investigate the stability of swirling nonpremixed flame with different nozzle geometries. Adzlan and Gotoda [8] studied the behavior of stable vortex breakdown occurring in a coaxial swirling jet with a density difference experimentally and considered the effect of density difference on the height of stagnation point. Litvinov et al [9] performed an experimental study of strongly swirling air flow with high Reynolds number to characterize precessing vortex core (PVC) and proved an analytical model of a helical vortex which is useful to describe or predict PVC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%