2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-013-0598-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of two-phase electrolysis processes: comparison with or without gravity

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b ): video recordings during the experiments reveal that although the electrodes do not show noticeable differences in their hydrogen evolution behaviour in terrestrial conditions, their microgravity behaviour differs significantly: here, the evolved hydrogen gas is not released from the thin-film electrode surface and bubbles coalesce in proximity to the electrode, whereas the gas bubble release is enhanced on the nanostructured photoelectrodes. Similar observations have been made in various studies of water electrolysis in microgravity environments 9 , 15 , 22 , 23 , where the absence of buoyancy and the suppression of natural convection caused the coalescence of gas bubbles on the electrode surface and the formation of froth layers. The resulting mass transfer limitations and the increased ohmic drop in the gas bubble dispersion zone in proximity to the electrode led to a substantial decrease in current density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b ): video recordings during the experiments reveal that although the electrodes do not show noticeable differences in their hydrogen evolution behaviour in terrestrial conditions, their microgravity behaviour differs significantly: here, the evolved hydrogen gas is not released from the thin-film electrode surface and bubbles coalesce in proximity to the electrode, whereas the gas bubble release is enhanced on the nanostructured photoelectrodes. Similar observations have been made in various studies of water electrolysis in microgravity environments 9 , 15 , 22 , 23 , where the absence of buoyancy and the suppression of natural convection caused the coalescence of gas bubbles on the electrode surface and the formation of froth layers. The resulting mass transfer limitations and the increased ohmic drop in the gas bubble dispersion zone in proximity to the electrode led to a substantial decrease in current density.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The catalyst micro- and nanotopography have decisive influence on the life cycle of bubbles on the surface. The growth and accumulation of bubbles on the thin-film electrode leads to a froth layer also observed in dark electrolysis experiments 9 , 15 , 22 , 23 that seriously inhibits the hydrogen evolution reaction. Figure 5a sketches the effect of lateral accumulation of gas bubbles that form a gaseous interphase which increasingly suppresses hydronium ion transport to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Interestingly, a number of recent studies have eliminated the contribution of bubbleinduced convection by performing experiments in reduced gravity [37][38][39]. Mandin and coauthors have applied this technique to the electrolysis of water [37] and CuSO4 [38], and Sakuma et al [39] minimized convection in is manner in order to focus on the effect of electrode wettability.…”
Section: Bubble-induced Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efforts have also been made in the two-phase flow and performance analysis of electrolyzer cells [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Grigoriev et al [45] reported a two-phase mathematical model for a high pressure PEMEC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%