Experimental Investigation of Transonic Buffet Control on a Wing Airfoil Using Tangential Jet Blowing

Abramova, K. A.; Petrov, Albert Vasilievich; Potapchik, A. V.; Soudakov, Vitaly

doi:10.1134/s0015462820040023

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Salimi et al (2022) for example numerically investigated a fluidic thrustvectoring and achieved a vector angle of 17.1 degrees via slot injection of methane fuel. In cases of transonic flow over wings or airfoils the flow control can act on the moving shock waves downstream, thus expanding the local supersonic zone; suppressing flow separation caused by shock/boundary layer interaction; and delaying the transonic buffeting caused by the pressure fluctuations due to unsteady shock/boundary layer interaction (Abramova et al 2020).…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift Configurations

2023

JAFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enhancement in the aerodynamic performance of wings and airfoils is very notable when Active Flow Control (AFC) is applied to Short Take-off and Landing aircraft (STOL). The present numerical study shows the application of steady, pulsed and synthetic tangential jets applied to the plain flap shoulder of a modified NASA Trapezoidal Wing. Pulsed jets are modeled by sinusoidal and square waveforms while synthetic jets are modeled only by pure sine waveform. The freestream airflow conditions are Mach number equal to 0.2 and Reynolds number equal to 4.3 million based on the mean aerodynamic chord. The presented simulations are two-dimensional and based on RANS for steady jet cases and URANS for pulsed and synthetic cases, compiled with the open-source suite SU2 and adapted for time varying boundary conditions. Numerical results for modified configurations based on the same baseline wing profile considering different leading edges, jet slot height, flap position, blowing mass flow, type and frequency of the jets are presented. Curves of pressure coefficient distribution revealed a substantial influence upstream of the AFC, around the slat and main element. The jet slot height analysis showed that the lift gain is also influenced by the slot size due to the change of the local flow velocity considering the same blowing momentum coefficient. Regarding the jet frequency, no significant differences on the lift coefficients were found between the reduced frequencies F+ equal to 1 and 2. Results of aerodynamic loads showed an improved lift coefficient in relation to the baseline airfoil when pulsed and steady jets are employed. Pulsed jets under square waveform were effective even at high deflected flap condition at 50°, with a significant gain in the lift coefficient of 36%, in relation to the uncontrolled case, combined with a drag reduction of 20%, and a decrease in mass flow up to 49% in relation to the steady jet for the same lift gain. Although sine and square waveform results presented similar improvements for lift, the drag is around 15% higher for the former. When compared with the steady jet case, the mass flow reduction is 36% for the sinewave. Synthetic jets with zero-net-mass-flux proved superior to the baseline conventional multi-element airfoil only with deployed flap at 50°, where a modest lift improvement of 5% was observed.

show abstract

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift Configurations

2023

JAFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Experimental Investigation of Transonic Buffet Control on a Wing Airfoil Using Tangential Jet Blowing

Cited by 1 publication

References 13 publications

Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift Configurations

Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift Configurations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About