Experimental investigation of the thermal dispersivity term and its significance in the heat transport equation for flow in sediments

Abstract

[1] A review of heat and solute transport in sediments demonstrates that the use of heat as a tracer has not been experimentally evaluated under the same experimental conditions as those used for the evaluation of solute as a tracer. Furthermore, there appears to be disagreement in the earth science literature over the significance of the thermal dispersivity term. To help resolve this disagreement, detailed experimentation with typical groundwater flow velocities (Darcy range, Re < 2.5) was conducted in a specifically designed hydraulic tank containing well-sorted saturated sand. The experiment enabled, for the first time, the precise monitoring of heat and solute tracer movement from a point source in separate runs under identical solid matrix and steady state flow conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that heat transport with natural groundwater flow velocities can reach a transition zone between conduction and convection (0.5 < Pe t < 2.5). The thermal dispersion behavior can be described by using a thermal dispersivity coefficient and the square of the thermal front velocity. We propose an empirical formulation for thermal dispersion with Darcy flow in natural porous media and clarify the disagreement regarding its significance. Finally, it was observed that Darcy velocities independently derived from heat and solute experimentation show a systematic discrepancy of up to 20%, and that experimental thermal dispersion results contain significant scatter.Citation: Rau, G. C., M. S. Andersen, and R. I. Acworth (2012), Experimental investigation of the thermal dispersivity term and its significance in the heat transport equation for flow in sediments, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03511,

The Compatibility of Geothermal Power Plants with Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems: The Case of the Cesine Wetland (Southern Italy)

“…In each time step, the numerical results show the maximum temperature variations occur in the shallow aquifer, as confirmed by monitoring activities. It seems the reasonable effect of the highest advection contribution due to the highest hydraulic conductivity, as already observed by previous experiences [52,53].…”

Importance of thermal dispersivity in designing groundwater heat pump (GWHP) system: Field and numerical study

“…Longitudinal thermal dispersivity values reported in the literature indicate that the thermal dispersivity of aquifers can vary in wide ranges of 0.1e100 m [32]. There is dissimilarity as well as similarity between the mechanism of heat and solute transport in saturated porous media [22]. Therefore, it will be necessary to estimate the site thermal dispersivity via field-based experiments for better prediction of the subsurface heat transport process and the estimation of the geothermal potential associated with GWHP systems.…”

“…That is, the thermal dispersivity term is not significant at the low flow velocity because the effective diffusivity is relatively large in magnitude. However, as the flow velocity increases and exceeds a specific point, this term becomes significant [22]. From the hydrogeological and thermal conditions of the field site as listed in Table 2, two terms in Equation (5) were calculated.…”

Effectiveness of distributed temperature measurements for early detection of piping in river embankments

“…Equation (1) neglects thermal dispersion, which is the spreading of heat caused by the fluctuation of the microstreamlines with respect to the main fluid flow direction because of the existence of a pore system. Although in solute transport -which is described by the same equation -dispersion is significant, Rau et al (2012) show that, at the submetre scale, dispersion of heat in soils is negligible. Dispersion can however occur at a larger scale because of the combined variability of micro-streamlines and hydraulic conductivity.…”