1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90627-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of the density profile in the liquid-vapor interface of mercury and gallium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements confirmed that the liquid/vapor interfacial region is relatively sharp, with no deviations from the average structure extending beyond 10 Å. Although the results of Bosio et al 31 could be modeled with an atomically layered density profile, their coarse resolution allowed an equally good modeling by a monotonic profile, as shown by the authors. For Ga, with an atomic diameter dϳ2.5 Å, the signature of atomic layering is expected to be a peak in the specular reflectivity near q z ϳ2.4 Å Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These measurements confirmed that the liquid/vapor interfacial region is relatively sharp, with no deviations from the average structure extending beyond 10 Å. Although the results of Bosio et al 31 could be modeled with an atomically layered density profile, their coarse resolution allowed an equally good modeling by a monotonic profile, as shown by the authors. For Ga, with an atomic diameter dϳ2.5 Å, the signature of atomic layering is expected to be a peak in the specular reflectivity near q z ϳ2.4 Å Ϫ1 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For Ga, with an atomic diameter dϳ2.5 Å, the signature of atomic layering is expected to be a peak in the specular reflectivity near q z ϳ2.4 Å Ϫ1 . In addition, Ga readily oxidizes, 32,33 and ultrahigh vacuum ͑UHV͒ and surface cleaning techniques were not employed by Bosio et al 31 but have been utilized by Kawamoto et al 30 and Regan et al 21 The experiments presented here have relied on UHV conditions and measurements that extend out to q z ϳ3 Å Ϫ1 to unambiguously establish surface-induced atomic layering. This approach differs substantially from measurements on Hg, 20 which are simplified by its relatively small reduction potential that consequently allows the surface to be kept oxide free by enclosing it in a reducing atmosphere of H 2 gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though long inaccessible via X-ray probes, recent developments in synchrotron radiation sources delivering intense brilliant X-rays have enabled access to this liquid-liquid interface. X-ray investigations of layering and charge effects provided new insight into the atomic structure specifically (Barton et al, 1986;Bosio et al, 1984;Dimasi et al, 1998;Magnussen et al, 1995;Duval et al, 2012). Studies of interface charge transfer at immiscible liquid-liquid interfaces and nanoparticle growth (Grü nder et al, 2011) are key to understanding these processes and offer interesting applications, for example for the production of nanoparticles by electrodeposition (Carim et al, 2011).…”
Section: Adsorption At the Liquid Mercury-electrolyte Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface X-ray scattering methods belong to the very few experimental approaches that provide such data, even for interfaces between two extended immiscible liquid phases, in situ with atomic scale resolution. For the free surfaces of liquids in contact with a gas phase, extensive studies of the vertical and in-plane structure have been performed by X-ray reflectivity, diffuse X-ray scattering, and grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction, providing a wealth of quantitative results on the surface structure of dielectric (Braslau et al, 1988;Ocko et al, 1994) and metallic liquids (Barton et al, 1986;Bosio et al, 1984;Dimasi et al, 1998;Magnussen et al, 1995), surface segregation (Regan et al, 1997;Shpyrko et al, 2006), surface phase transitions (Deutsch et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1993), and the structure and phase behaviour of organic layers on liquids (Kraack et al, 2002;Magnussen et al, 1996;Weinbach et al, 1994). In contrast, investigations of the deeply buried interfaces between two liquids are scarce and have been performed only for a few selected systems (see, for some examples, Bosio et al, 1984;Duval et al, 2012;Grü nder et al, 2011;Luo et al, 2006;Tamam et al, 2011;Schlossman & Tikhonov, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface X-ray scattering methods can uniquely deliver such dataeven for interfaces between two extended immiscible liquid phasesin situ and operando with an atomic-scale resolution. This was realized as early as in the 1990s; 31 however, X-ray investigations of these deeply buried interfaces were hampered by experimental challenges that make these measurements by far more challenging than X-ray scattering studies of solid-liquid electrodes. These difficulties include mechanical stability, high X-ray absorption and the background and the problem that the sample cannot be tilted, requiring specialized X-ray diffractometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%