2021
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2021.1924796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of the bearing capacity of deformed segmental tunnel linings strengthened by a special composite structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ductility was defined as the ultimate load-carrying capacity. Drawing on existing research results [28], the bearing capacity enhancement rate ηp = (Pu − P0)/P0, the stiffness enhancement rate ηk = ke/k0, and the structural ductility after reinforcement ∆S = Su − Sa were defined. The comparative results of the reinforcement effect are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Reinforcement Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ductility was defined as the ultimate load-carrying capacity. Drawing on existing research results [28], the bearing capacity enhancement rate ηp = (Pu − P0)/P0, the stiffness enhancement rate ηk = ke/k0, and the structural ductility after reinforcement ∆S = Su − Sa were defined. The comparative results of the reinforcement effect are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Reinforcement Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the damage mode, the damage of the steelplate-reinforced structure is manifested as the interfacial stripping damage between the steel plate and the original lining concrete. After reaching the peak load, the steel plate is completely plated from the lining, the steel plate rapidly quits the work, and the reinforced structure cannot withstand the external load and rapidly enters the plasticity stage, showing an apparent bri le damage mode [28]. In contrast, because of the combined shape of the UHPC layer, screws, and welding studs in the steel plate-UHPC reinforcing method, the interfacial bond layer has superior bond and ductility.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Reinforcement Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the DN200 pipe, the spacing between the two battens was set to 25 mm; for the DN400 pipe sections, the spacing between the two battens was set to 40 mm. The test loading speed was set to 5 mm/min and the loading displacement to 10% of the pipes' diameter [14,15].…”
Section: Measurement Point Arrangement and Loading Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the DN200 pipe, the spacing between the two battens was set to 25 mm; for the DN400 pipe sections, the spacing between the two battens was set to 40 mm. The test loading speed was set to 5 mm/min and the loading displacement to 10% of the pipes' diameter [14,15]. The plate load test results of specimens F-1, F-4, and F-9 are shown in Table 5, and the load-displacement curves of each specimen are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the Load-bearing Performance Of Corr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the demand for shield tunnel reinforcement is also increasing [ 1 ]. The methods of reinforcing shield tunnel linings with large deformations include FRP reinforcement [ 2 , 3 ], steel plate reinforcement [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], steel plate–UHPC composite reinforcement [ 7 , 8 ], and corrugated steel reinforcement [ 9 ], among which steel plate reinforcement is widely used in urban metro shield tunnel linings. However, as shown in Table 1 , due to the large self-weight of steel plates, mechanical arm support is an indispensable part of the construction, as shown in Figure 1 a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%