2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab60dd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of sheath effects on I–V traces of strongly electron emitting probes

Abstract: I-V traces of strongly emitting emissive probes are investigated in a multidiople filament discharge. It is found that at sufficiently high neutral pressure and emitting current, the variation of the I-V traces and their associated inflection points no longer follow the previous predictions of space charge limited (SCL) models. A new, steep slope region of the I-V trace appears near the plasma potential when the probe is strongly emitting, causing the inflection point and the floating potential to increase tow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that the zero-capacitance point 'predicted' in figure 1 never appeared in figures 5 and 6, and the overshot of the electron saturation current is also quite different between figures 5 and 6 and the predictions shown in figure 1. This suggests that the transition from ion sheath to electron sheath and electron sheath formation has been more complicated than that predicted by conventional theories, as recent studies suggested [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should also be noted that the zero-capacitance point 'predicted' in figure 1 never appeared in figures 5 and 6, and the overshot of the electron saturation current is also quite different between figures 5 and 6 and the predictions shown in figure 1. This suggests that the transition from ion sheath to electron sheath and electron sheath formation has been more complicated than that predicted by conventional theories, as recent studies suggested [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Particularly with the LaB 6 cathode being 2 mm thick, increase of heating power is generally realized by a higher heating current, which eventually forms a strong enough magnetic field near the rod to prevent electrons from escaping the virtual cathode, extinguishing the discharge, as illustrated in figure 1 [15]. Note that any hot cathode can be TL or SCL depends on plasma parameters, just as emissive probes always experience a TL regime and a SCL one depending on the probe bias and the parameters of the plasma in which the probe is immersed in [23][24][25][26]. Physically speaking, an emissive probes shares the same underlying sheath formation mechanism as a hot cathodes immersed in an existing plasma and theoretical formulations solving sheath formation problems for hot cathodes are often tested with emissive probes [23,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Space-charge Limited Hot Cathodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that any hot cathode can be TL or SCL depends on plasma parameters, just as emissive probes always experience a TL regime and a SCL one depending on the probe bias and the parameters of the plasma in which the probe is immersed in [23][24][25][26]. Physically speaking, an emissive probes shares the same underlying sheath formation mechanism as a hot cathodes immersed in an existing plasma and theoretical formulations solving sheath formation problems for hot cathodes are often tested with emissive probes [23,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Space-charge Limited Hot Cathodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of electron sheath near the probe increase as probe bias voltage increasing respect to plasma potential. In addition, the electron sheath thickness 𝜆 𝑒,𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 ℎ ∼ (𝑉 bias − 𝑉 𝑝 ) 3/4 𝜆 Debye ∼ (𝑉 bias − 𝑉 𝑝 ) 3/4 (𝑇 𝑒 /𝑛 𝑒 ) 1/2 is coupled with the perturbations of 𝑇 𝑒 , 𝑉 𝑝 , and 𝜆 Debye by the effects described in (c) [29] at high probe bias, with which the effective area of the probe expands considerably. Thus, the perturbations to the plasma parameters via the probe as an electron loss area and sheath formation near the probe becomes a self-consistent problem at sufficiently high probe bias.…”
Section: Expanding Fitting Range Of Power Law Parametrizationmentioning
confidence: 99%