2014
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2014.968742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of scour around semi-conical piers under steady current action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow past semi-conical piers vertically mounted on the bed was simulated based on the configurations in the experimental study of flow and scour around semi-conical piers by Aghaee-Shalmani and Hakimzadeh (2015). Semi-conical piers with various side slopes α = 0 • , 5 • , 10 • and 15 • were tested in the numerical model.…”
Section: Computational Domain and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow past semi-conical piers vertically mounted on the bed was simulated based on the configurations in the experimental study of flow and scour around semi-conical piers by Aghaee-Shalmani and Hakimzadeh (2015). Semi-conical piers with various side slopes α = 0 • , 5 • , 10 • and 15 • were tested in the numerical model.…”
Section: Computational Domain and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bozkus and Yildiz (2004); Vaghefi et al (2016) reported reducing scour depth for inclined pier toward the downstream. Sumer et al (1995); Fredsøe and Sumer (1997); Pourahmadi and Hakimzadeh (2011); Aghaee-Shalmani and Hakimzadeh (2015) in their experimental studies have shown that the semi-conical piers can reduce the scour depth. Sumer et al (1995) indicated that the bed shear stresses around cone-shaped piers are decreased as the side slopes are increased, and robustness of the horseshoe vortices are mainly reduced compared to a circular cylinder (Sumer et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that external sweep and internal ejection events were an effective mechanism for sediment entrainment around a single circular bridge pier. Aghaee-Shalmani & Hakimzadeh [10] presented the experimental results of scour around semi-conical piers to show the effect of their lateral slopes on the scour depth under steady current. The results showed that the scour depth of the pier with circular section with the largest lateral slope angle was reduced about 36 and 53% at the upstream and downstream sides of the pier in comparison with those of the circular cylinder, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally Aghaee-Shalmani, and Hakimzadeh. [9] and Al-tameemi et al [10] used in their research works semi conical pier but Al-tameemi et al [10] used upstream curved face too with the conical pier .The study was confined to clear-water flow around bridge piers with nonuniform sediment sizes.The main objective of the present study was to determine the best system which combines several countermeasures to reduce the local scour as much as possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…): Comparison between calculated and measured relative scour depth for oblong pier using Eqns (9). and(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%