2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of nondipole effects in photoemission at the advanced light source

Abstract: Breakdowns in the dipole approximation in the soft-X-ray photon-energy range ðhno5 keVÞ were first observed 30 years ago and have been studied theoretically for many years. However, only recently their significance at low energies has been appreciated when advances in gas-phase-photoemission experiments using synchrotron radiation began to highlight numerous examples of significant nondipole effects at photon energies as low as tens of eV. In a previous publication [Hemmers et al., 2004a. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example the absolute value of γ (2) 4 for the 1 S residual ion state is ten and two times larger than for the 1 D and 3 P states, respectively. Note that it is possible to write down the expression for δ (2) in the product form (24), where dipole and quadrupole amplitudes are separated in different factors. The dipole factor (…”
Section: Sequential 2pdi Of Neonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example the absolute value of γ (2) 4 for the 1 S residual ion state is ten and two times larger than for the 1 D and 3 P states, respectively. Note that it is possible to write down the expression for δ (2) in the product form (24), where dipole and quadrupole amplitudes are separated in different factors. The dipole factor (…”
Section: Sequential 2pdi Of Neonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the much-used TPP-2 M formula [14,15]; y is the electron emission angle with respect to the surface and O(hn, x, y), which is equivalent once integrated over x and y to the spectrometer intensity response function, can be determined from reference-sample calibration measurements [16]. For excitation energies in the keV regime, if not even below this, non-dipole or retardation corrections are needed for a fully accurate description of ds Qn'j ðhn;Þ=dO, as first demonstrated by Krause [17], and discussed in much more detail elsewhere [18]. Illustration of a typical experimental configuration for photoelectron spectroscopy experiments, together with the various types of measurements possible, including: (a) simple spectra or energy-distribution curves, (b) core-level photoelectron diffraction, (c) valence-band mapping or energy vsk plots, (d) spin-resolved spectra, (e) exciting with incident X-rays such that there is total reflection and/or a standing wave in the sample, (f) using higher or much lower photon energies than have been typical in the past, (g) taking advantage of space and/or time resolution, and (h) surrounding the sample with high ambient sample pressures of several torr.…”
Section: The Basic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22. Note that, as the photon energy is increased, one can no longer neglect the momentum of the photoñ k hn in conserving wave vector, one manifestation of non-dipole effects in the excitation [17,18,79]. Determiningk f inside the surface from a measurement ofk f outside the surface (which may be slightly different fromk f inside due to crossing the inner potential at the surface) and then the set ofg n vectors which projectk f back into the reduced Brillouin zone (BZ) in which the band structure is usually described thus permits directly measuring E binding ðk i Þ ¼ E i ðk i Þ, the band structure, or if final-state screening and many-electron excitations are taken into account, more properly the spectral function as calculated from some sort of many-electron theory [5].…”
Section: The Basic Arpes Measurement In the Ups Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The momentum transfer can lead to a symmetry breakdown in terms of a forward-backward asymmetry in the photoelectron angular distribution (PAD). Generally, the importance of this nondipole effect and its strong influence on various phenomena were demonstrated in numerous studies ranging from fundamental research in atoms and molecules 1 , 2 , over applications in condensed matter 3 and realization of high-harmonic generation lasers 4 to investigations of astrophysical interest 5 . With the rapid evolution of ultrabright X-ray light sources such as free-electron lasers (FELs), the relevance of nondipole effects for photoionization of ionic targets in nonlinear and time-resolved studies gains further importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%