2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of Kr diffusion in UO2+: Slight deviations from stoichiometry, significant effects on diffusion kinetics and mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, although the corresponding studies agrees rather well on , is thus explained by slight and undiscernible variations on the uranium dioxide stoichiometry between studies (either from slightly different oxygen partial pressure conditions and/or impurity effects). This assumption is also supported by extended results to be published [62].…”
Section: Arrhenius Law Of Xenon and Krypton Implanted In Uosupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4, although the corresponding studies agrees rather well on , is thus explained by slight and undiscernible variations on the uranium dioxide stoichiometry between studies (either from slightly different oxygen partial pressure conditions and/or impurity effects). This assumption is also supported by extended results to be published [62].…”
Section: Arrhenius Law Of Xenon and Krypton Implanted In Uosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…where R eva is the sublimation rate in kg/m 2 /s, P sat(T) (in Pa) is the saturated vapour pressure for UO 2 for a given temperature (P sat(T) data deduced from the work by Ackermann et al [61]), M W is the UO 2 molecular weight (0.270 kg/mol), R is the universal gas constant (8.134 J/K/mol) and T is the temperature in K. On another project [62], this predictive model and its associated P sat(T) input data was confronted with measurements of mass difference before and after annealing: the model and the weight measurement agree well with a difference of only ~15% erosion rate. The evaporation rate at 1300, 1350 and 1400°C is calculated at 0.13, 0.52 and 1.67 pm/s by the model.…”
Section: Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%