2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11204-019-09580-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Interference Between Adjacent Footings on Layered Cohesionless Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The load-settlement curve for cases of isolated footing and two strip footings; both cases rest on the surface of a sand layer without cavities for various spacing (x/B) are presented in Figs. 4, it was found that the bearing capacity of the footings was maximum when the spacing ratios (interferences) from one center to another (footings) varied in the range of x/B = 1.25 to 1.5, these results are similar to those obtained by (Lee and Eun [14] ). This reflects the fact that larger footings cause larger settlements compared with smaller footings.…”
Section: Test Series X/b H/b L/bsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The load-settlement curve for cases of isolated footing and two strip footings; both cases rest on the surface of a sand layer without cavities for various spacing (x/B) are presented in Figs. 4, it was found that the bearing capacity of the footings was maximum when the spacing ratios (interferences) from one center to another (footings) varied in the range of x/B = 1.25 to 1.5, these results are similar to those obtained by (Lee and Eun [14] ). This reflects the fact that larger footings cause larger settlements compared with smaller footings.…”
Section: Test Series X/b H/b L/bsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several studies have investigated the effect of footing interference on bearing capacity. Such as, Boufarh et al [4] experimentally investigated the effect of interference of two strip footings resting on a bilayer soil, and concluded that the efficiency factor is proportional to the internal friction angle of the ground of the first layer, particularly when the foundations are very close, because the increase of the angle of friction causes the expansion of the shear zone under the foundations. Gupta and Sitharam [7] conducted experimental and numerical studies on the interference of sand-based square footings, and concluded that the maximum interference effect is observed in the case wherein the spacing between the footings was 0.5B, and was approximately negligible in the case wherein the spacing between the footings was equal to 2B, which B is the width of the footing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [10] studied the failure surface in granular soil under two closely spaced strip footings and concluded that the failure patterns observed for granular soil conform to those proposed by the theory in [2]. Authors in [11] experimentally studied the interference effect of two closely strip footings constructed on bi-layer soil. Authors in [12] studied experimentally and numerically the interference of closely spaced square footings on sandy soil, and concluded that the maximum interference effect is observed when the spacing between the two footings is 0.5B, and was approximately negligible when the spacing between the footings was equal to 2B, where B is the footing's width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The studies offering the understanding of two or multiple interfering footings using analytical/numerical methods use upper and lower bound limit analysis [2][3][4][5][6][7], finite difference method [8][9][10], finite element method [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and analytical method [19,20], the probabilistic method [21] and others [22]. Then several experimental studies [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] have been reported on the interference of surface footings. Lavasan et al [30] studied the behaviour of two adjacent rigid, rough strip footings laid on the surface of sand by employing finite difference method (FDM) and kinematic element methods (KEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%