2008
DOI: 10.1155/2008/109120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Innovative Internal Trailing Edge Cooling Configurations with Pentagonal Arrangement and Elliptic Pin Fin

Abstract: This paper describes a heat transfer experimental study of four different internal trailing edge cooling configurations based on pin fin schemes. The aim of the study is the comparison between innovative configurations and standard ones. So, a circular pin fin configuration with an innovative pentagonal scheme is compared to a standard staggered scheme, while two elliptic pin fin configurations are compared to each other turning the ellipse from the streamwise to the spanwise direction. For each configuration,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison of G2.1 with G2.2 for both axial and axial-radial configurations, the spanwise oriented pin fins always generate a higher HTC value over the whole investigated surfaces L1 and L2, due to higher turbulence level induced by their disposition. For the axial configuration, see Fig. 2, previous results [Facchini et al, 2008], by comparison with the axial-radial geometries, show lower values of HTC over L1 and L2 surfaces and the HTC distribution is uniform along the spanwise direction. On the contrary with the axial redirection of inlet radial flow, the HTC distribution is dependent on massflow rate percentage flowing through the tip section and is independent from pin disposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…By comparison of G2.1 with G2.2 for both axial and axial-radial configurations, the spanwise oriented pin fins always generate a higher HTC value over the whole investigated surfaces L1 and L2, due to higher turbulence level induced by their disposition. For the axial configuration, see Fig. 2, previous results [Facchini et al, 2008], by comparison with the axial-radial geometries, show lower values of HTC over L1 and L2 surfaces and the HTC distribution is uniform along the spanwise direction. On the contrary with the axial redirection of inlet radial flow, the HTC distribution is dependent on massflow rate percentage flowing through the tip section and is independent from pin disposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[15], Tarchi et al [39] and Effendy et al [40], who studied similar subjects through the staggered arrays of pin-fin cooling. For example, the peak heat transfer occurred in the last row of the pin-fin located in a wedge duct, and the increase of the heat transfer coefficient is stronger within a contraction channel than that in a parallel duct.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Coefficient At the Pin-fin Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulence generated by the elliptical pins was greatly reduced in comparison to the cylindrical pins and, as such, the heat transfer performance from the array was also reduced. Tarchi et al [4] also studied elliptical pins, but oriented them with their major axis perpendicular to the flow. While these elliptical pins exhibited higher heat transfer than the array of cylindrical pins, they generated much higher pressure drop.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of pin fins into a flow increases the heat transfer by adding area over which heat transfer can take place and by inducing vortical structures at the pin's base. Conventional pin fins are cylindrical in shape, though other shapes have been studied as well [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Generally, previous studies have examined the combined effects on heat transfer from both pin and endwall surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%