2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40940-016-0029-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of energy dissipation mechanisms in laminated safety glass for combined blast-temperature loading scenarios

Abstract: Protective glazing is an important field of research and development as most common injuries resulting from an explosion event in urban territory are caused by the occurring shock wave and accelerated fragments of failed glass structures. In this context a selection of laminated glass specimens differing in lamination technique, extent of tempering and interlayer material is tested in shock tube experiments at the facilities of the Bundeswehr Technical Center 52 (WTD 52) in Oberjettenberg. Unlike conservative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blast response of PVB-laminated glass panels, and particularly the post-fracture response, when all glass layers have fractured, is a complex multi-disciplinary problem that is still not well understood. Full-scale blast tests have been performed by various researchers to study this, using high-explosive detonations [3][4][5][6][7][8] and shocktube simulations [3,[9][10][11]. These tests typically focus on recording the global peak-displacement time-history of the panel through all stages of deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blast response of PVB-laminated glass panels, and particularly the post-fracture response, when all glass layers have fractured, is a complex multi-disciplinary problem that is still not well understood. Full-scale blast tests have been performed by various researchers to study this, using high-explosive detonations [3][4][5][6][7][8] and shocktube simulations [3,[9][10][11]. These tests typically focus on recording the global peak-displacement time-history of the panel through all stages of deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 summarises the salient enhanced material properties of PVB for strain-rates representative of blast response, which typically range from 7.6 s -1 to 30 s -1 according to full-scale blast tests (Morison, 2007;Hooper, 2011). These properties are also temperature dependent, with a stiffer / more flexible response observed at low / high temperatures respectively (Bermbach et al, 2016;Chen et al, 5 2018;Samieian et al, 2018;Kraus, 2019). With many commonly encountered, commercially available PVB products, including Butacite® and Trofisol® (from Kuraray), Saflex® (from Eastman), Lam 51H ® (from Everlam) and S-Lec™ (Sekisui), it is clearly important to note that the material properties can vary significantly depending on the type and manufacturer of the PVB (CPNI, 2019).…”
Section: Glass Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 45°C (maximum design interlayer temperature for blast design situation) and Savineau, 2007) and SGP Ionoplast De Vogel (2008), originally in Bennison and Gizzi (2007) The conducted transient FE calculations are performed in Ansys (2014) with geometrical nonlinear approach, considering the first amplitude of the vibrating plate. The boundary conditions and pressure application of the structural model with line supports in positive and negative y-direction are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Thermal Calculation Of Typical Dgu and Tgu Of Facadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, increasing deflection and in-plane strain with increasing temperature due to the temperaturedependent material properties of the chemical adhesive bond and PVB interlayer is observed. Bermbach et al (2016) conducted experimental investigations with focus on postfracture behavior of different laminates at 13°C and 30°C concluding that the influence of temperature is significant, as it may triple average strain rates for the same blast loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%