2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation of composite shear walls under shear loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 Preview of the stress distribution on the members of composite plate shear wall system [3] If the composite plate is correctly designed (yielding occurs before buckling) axial force appearing within the frame column would be equal to sum of vertical loads and shear stresses from panel as presented in Fig. 10c, where its value might be determined through Eq.…”
Section: Arabzadeh Et Al [3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 10 Preview of the stress distribution on the members of composite plate shear wall system [3] If the composite plate is correctly designed (yielding occurs before buckling) axial force appearing within the frame column would be equal to sum of vertical loads and shear stresses from panel as presented in Fig. 10c, where its value might be determined through Eq.…”
Section: Arabzadeh Et Al [3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to steel plate shear walls, composite plate systems provide more stiffness, greater strength and better energy dissipation capacity for the same steel plate thicknesses. Additionally, during more frequent low and moderate size seismic events composite plate shear walls preclude steel plate buckling and concrete cracking where both might cause periods of occupancy interruption due to the necessary repairs [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the energy method, Arabzade et al proposed a theoretical model for calculating the elastic buckling coefficients of C‐SPWs characterized by the concrete panel attached to one side of steel plate . This theoretical model was validated with a comparison with experimental results . Using the Galerkin method, Lopatin and Morozov performed a theoretical research on the buckling of a rectangular sandwich plate with all edges fully clamped under uniaxial compressive loading .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using high strength concrete also decreased the damage of the reinforced concrete panel. Furthermore, arranging the reinforcement in directions of 45° and 135° was found to be one of the ways to decline diagonal cracks . Another CSPSW with two reinforced concrete panels was tested by Guo et al However, during the experimental study, at 2% drift, a column of the specimen fractured, and the test was terminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the mentioned studies, the damage to the reinforced concrete was several diagonal cracks with the angle of roughly 45° or 135°. The cracks were perpendicular to each other and had an “X” shape . The main reason is that the concrete panel prevents the out‐of‐plane buckling of the infill steel plate; as a result, several tension cracks spread out on the panel .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%