2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3507162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation of Axial and Beam-Riding Propulsive Physics with TEA CO[sub 2] laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a PRF of approximately 5.0-10.0 kHz, at the given conditions. Similar blast wave residency times are obtained in runs [16][17][18][19]. Run 21 presented a longer residency time of 292 μs, based on the schlieren and the reestablishment of the original flowfield and with the pressure disturbances also lasting on the order of 300 μs.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This leads to a PRF of approximately 5.0-10.0 kHz, at the given conditions. Similar blast wave residency times are obtained in runs [16][17][18][19]. Run 21 presented a longer residency time of 292 μs, based on the schlieren and the reestablishment of the original flowfield and with the pressure disturbances also lasting on the order of 300 μs.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Note that all signals simultaneously jumped when the air breakdown took place at the surface of the shroud (the "hammer"), and the subsequent pressure increases (caused by the propagating blast wave) are seen as offset peaks in Fig. 21, quite in contrast to previous results from runs [16][17][18][19], despite the same geometrical configuration employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these results it can be seen that the calculated C m -based on surface pressure distributions-are approximately 2.5 to 5 times higher than the C m obtained in previous research on the Myrabo Lightcraft models (Kenoyer et al, 2010;Myrabo, 2002;Wang, 2002). This would come as a surprise if not for the differences in model size, laser energy, and pulse-widths employed in these experiments.…”
Section: Impulse Generation Analysis From Surface Pressure Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In contrast, conventional chemical-fueled scramjets operate in the "constant pressure" mode, with thermal power released into the working fluid continuously and with considerably-longer combustion chambers than a Lightcraft's short absorption chamber. Furthermore, the aspect ratios (i.e., vehicle length-to-width ratio) of conventional scramjet-powered aircraft are generally much higher than those for spin-stabilized Lightcraft; the laser-boosted craft flown at White Sands Missile Range, all had aspect ratios close to one-a restriction driven by flight-dynamics, stability, and control requirements (Kenoyer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%