2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9491-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation into the effect of abrasive and force conditions in magnetic field-assisted finishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was perceived that slightly bonded particles may create a uniform flexible magnetic abrasive brush with a favorable motion of particles within the brush, thereby resulting in a smoother surface without imparting any further skewedness into surface. It was reported by Guo et al [9] that, upon keeping other process variables constant in MAF, SiC and coarse abrasives show higher material removal rate (MRR) than Al 2 O 3 and fine abrasives, meaning that SiC with larger abrasives reduces surface roughness significantly. They also highlighted a slight discrepancy in the force data, indicating that finer abrasives cause higher force, which is not the case in the micro-cutting of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was perceived that slightly bonded particles may create a uniform flexible magnetic abrasive brush with a favorable motion of particles within the brush, thereby resulting in a smoother surface without imparting any further skewedness into surface. It was reported by Guo et al [9] that, upon keeping other process variables constant in MAF, SiC and coarse abrasives show higher material removal rate (MRR) than Al 2 O 3 and fine abrasives, meaning that SiC with larger abrasives reduces surface roughness significantly. They also highlighted a slight discrepancy in the force data, indicating that finer abrasives cause higher force, which is not the case in the micro-cutting of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a conclusion is often imperatively stressed elsewhere in literature [23]. While surface roughness is considered a widely accepted performance indictor when the quality of surface is concerned, a more microscopic observation underpinning the material removal mechanism and surface damages, i.e., micro/nano cracks, fractures, and scratches, must be investigated to provide a holistic and informed quality evaluation of MAF [9]. In other words, a future mathematical model may need to take those perspectives into account to solicit the quality prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technological reduction of internal thread surface roughness Ra < 1.6 μm during tapping is inseparably associated to the improvement of the condition of cutting tool teeth contact surfaces that can be effected by performing finishing operations. Magnetic-abrasive finishing (MAF) [6,7] is a promising method of forming various conditions (rounding radius, roughness and microhardness) of tooth contact surfaces of a thread tap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most well-known is arguably the Magnetorheological Finishing (MRF) process, which is commercially available for superfinishing of high-value optics components [1]. Other MFAF processes include the magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) process [2], an apparatus for finishing of ground glass edge [3], a double-magnet configuration for high material removal rate [4,5] that can also be mounted on a robotic arm [6], an apparatus for finishing of internal surface of tubes [7], an apparatus for finishing of micropore X-ray focusing mirrors [8], and a ball-end tool [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%