2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigation and exergy analysis of the performance of a counter flow Ranque–Hilsch vortex tube with regard to nozzle cross-section areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The turbulent flow behaviour has been reported in the investigations of the flow pattern in a vortex tube and was clearly shown by the turbulent intensity of the flow, particularly by the peak value of the intensity in the central area of the tube [1,41,46]. The increased entropy of the system also results in a loss of total energy, which has been noticed in previous investigations [18,31,35,36,42,45,[47][48][49][50]. A free expansion process is typically achieved by allowing the gas to expand into a vacuum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The turbulent flow behaviour has been reported in the investigations of the flow pattern in a vortex tube and was clearly shown by the turbulent intensity of the flow, particularly by the peak value of the intensity in the central area of the tube [1,41,46]. The increased entropy of the system also results in a loss of total energy, which has been noticed in previous investigations [18,31,35,36,42,45,[47][48][49][50]. A free expansion process is typically achieved by allowing the gas to expand into a vacuum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Researchers have obtained varying results for effect of nozzle numbers on energy separation. Some of these (Saidi & Valipour, 2003;Kirmaci, 2009;Dincer, Avci, Baskaya, & Berber, 2010;Avci, 2013) have observed the decay in performance with increase in nozzle number, the reason of decay is increase in turbulence of the flow. While few (Promvonge & Eiamsa-ard, 2005;Eiamsa-ard, 2010;Bovand, Rashidi, & Esfahani, 2016) have mentioned that increase in nozzle number enhances the energy separation.…”
Section: Effect Of Nozzle Number and Nozzle Geometry (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, common nozzle geometry is circular and square slot along with the other geometries as seen in Experimental work has been performed by these (Saidi & Valipour, 2003;Promvonge & Eiamsaard, 2005;Dincer, Tasdemir, Baskaya, & Uysal, 2008;Takahama & Soga, 1966;Kirmaci, 2009;Dincer, Avci, Baskaya, & Berber, 2010;Eiamsa-ard, Wongcharee, & Promvonge, 2010;Chang, Li, Zhou, & Qiang, 2011;Mohmmadi & Farhadi, 2013) with regard to nozzle number (Avci, 2013;Bovand, Rashidi, & Esfahani, 2016) and nozzle geometry. Researchers have obtained varying results for effect of nozzle numbers on energy separation.…”
Section: Effect Of Nozzle Number and Nozzle Geometry (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was performed using O 2 and air as pressurised inlet gas. Dincer et al (2010) carried out an experimental study about exergy analysis of the performance of a counter-flow RHVT with regard to nozzle cross-section area. Markal et al (2012) analysed a vortex tube thermodynamically.…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Drawing Of a Counter Flow Vortex Tubementioning
confidence: 99%