2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-021-00980-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigation and Analysis on Borosilicate Glass Using Electrochemical Discharge Machining Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The machining of the borosilicate glass reported by Bellubbi et al 111 112 The machining of borosilicate glass using the ECDM process with the stirring of electrolyte was reported by Charak and Jawalkar. 101 They noticed that the material removal increased beyond the applied voltage of 53 V while stirring of electrolyte in the performed experiment. The stirring effect improves the surface finish by 20-79% and reduces the chance of formation of the RCL.…”
Section: Ceramics and Compositesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The machining of the borosilicate glass reported by Bellubbi et al 111 112 The machining of borosilicate glass using the ECDM process with the stirring of electrolyte was reported by Charak and Jawalkar. 101 They noticed that the material removal increased beyond the applied voltage of 53 V while stirring of electrolyte in the performed experiment. The stirring effect improves the surface finish by 20-79% and reduces the chance of formation of the RCL.…”
Section: Ceramics and Compositesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Table 1 Machining of Borosilicate glass reported. The stirring effect induced in electrolyte and surface finish improved from 20% to 79%, as a result of clearing the machining zone of debris, and less recast layers were formed 101 .…”
Section: Workpiece Of Ecdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at pH 2, only 73.2% degradation was achieved, suggesting the strong acidic pH conditions were not favorable for the degradation. 38 The effect of the catalyst loading was also evaluated by varying catalyst dosage from 0.6 to 1.2 g L −1 . On raising the amount of catalyst from 0.6 to 0.9 g L −1 , there was a significant increase in the degradation efficiency from 80.3% to 100%.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Various Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%