2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental infections of wild bank voles ( Myodes glareolus ) from nephropatia epidemica endemic and non-endemic regions revealed slight differences in Puumala virological course and immunological responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After 7 dpi, PUUV viral load decreased and persisted in bank voles while the bank vole serological response started to increase after two weeks of infection. The kinetics of PUUV replication and serological response observed in our study were congruent with the results obtained from bank voles from another French NE endemic (Jura) and non-endemic area (Ain) [ 14 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After 7 dpi, PUUV viral load decreased and persisted in bank voles while the bank vole serological response started to increase after two weeks of infection. The kinetics of PUUV replication and serological response observed in our study were congruent with the results obtained from bank voles from another French NE endemic (Jura) and non-endemic area (Ain) [ 14 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Over the last 10 years, a spatial expansion of NE cases outside of the endemic area has been observed in southern and western areas (National Reference Center for Hantavirus, [ 11 ]). We therefore previously proposed to discriminate NE endemic areas (lots of NE cases, for example, Ardennes [ 12 ]) and NE non-endemic areas (few or no cases of NE, for example, Loiret [ 13 ] and Ain [ 14 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An alternative hypothesis states that spatial variation in the outcomes of M. glareolus / PUUV interactions may affect PUUV replication and excretion in the environment, which could ultimately shape PUUV distribution and nephropathia epidemica incidence in Europe (Guivier et al, 2014; Rohfritsch, Guivier, Galan, Chaval, & Charbonnel, 2013). Indeed, voles differ in their probability of being infected by PUUV (Kallio et al, 2006) and experimental infections have confirmed that the outcome of PUUV infection could vary between individuals (Dubois, Castel, et al, 2017; Hardestam et al, 2008). Furthermore, the genetic background of bank voles contributes to the variation in the response to infection (Charbonnel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%