2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Infection of Macaques with a Wild Water Bird-Derived Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (H5N1)

Abstract: Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) continues to threaten human health. Non-human primate infection models of human influenza are desired. To establish an animal infection model with more natural transmission and to determine the pathogenicity of HPAIV isolated from a wild water bird in primates, we administered a Japanese isolate of HPAIV (A/whooper swan/Hokkaido/1/2008, H5N1 clade 2.3.2.1) to rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys, in droplet form, via the intratracheal route. Infection of the lower and u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a control, 4 ml of the virus solution was administered through multiple routes by the conventional method, that is, by the intranasal (0.4 ml each to the left and right nostril), intraoral (0.4 ml each to the left and right tonsil), intraocular (0.1 ml per eye), and intratracheal (2.2 ml using a tracheal catheter) routes (defined as 'the conventional method group'). The virus dose of 4 × 10 7 PFU of influenza virus was chosen for inoculation because a similar virus dose has been widely used in previous studies to infect NHPs to ensure the greatest likelihood of virus infection and replication in the inoculated animals 6,15,[17][18][19] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a control, 4 ml of the virus solution was administered through multiple routes by the conventional method, that is, by the intranasal (0.4 ml each to the left and right nostril), intraoral (0.4 ml each to the left and right tonsil), intraocular (0.1 ml per eye), and intratracheal (2.2 ml using a tracheal catheter) routes (defined as 'the conventional method group'). The virus dose of 4 × 10 7 PFU of influenza virus was chosen for inoculation because a similar virus dose has been widely used in previous studies to infect NHPs to ensure the greatest likelihood of virus infection and replication in the inoculated animals 6,15,[17][18][19] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant issue with nonhuman primate studies to date is that unlike human disease, infection causes death in only a small minority of animals (2123, 26). All published nonhuman primate studies have used an inoculation method involving application of virus in liquid suspension (2126) or via large droplets (27) into the trachea, often in combination with other mucosal routes. These delivery methods are unlikely to expose target cells in the alveoli to significant quantities of virus because liquid suspensions and/or large droplets are cleared by the mucociliary apparatus of the upper respiratory tract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the protective effects of rMV-Ed-H5HA or rMV-HL-Vko-H5HA against H5N1 infection, we challenged the vaccinated monkeys with H5N1 (A/whooper swan/Hokkaido/1/2008 clade 2.3.2.1) as previously described 13 . We monitored their body temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, bodyweight, and appetite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we developed a candidate HPAIV vaccine based on the MV vector. We generated rMV expressing an HPAIV antigen and evaluated its efficacy on the challenge with a wild HPAIV (H5N1) strain in a previously established model of HPAIV infection in non-human primate 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%