1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(18)32208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental immunisation of lambs against pneumonic pasteurellosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suboptimal efficacy of some pasteurella vaccines against experimental A2 challenge [4] may be explained by the limited range of antigens present on the surface of bacterial cells grown in iron replete media. In contrast, the increased number and strong immunogenicity of antigens seen on the surface of 'in vivo' grown cells may be essential for an effective vaccine against pasteurellosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Suboptimal efficacy of some pasteurella vaccines against experimental A2 challenge [4] may be explained by the limited range of antigens present on the surface of bacterial cells grown in iron replete media. In contrast, the increased number and strong immunogenicity of antigens seen on the surface of 'in vivo' grown cells may be essential for an effective vaccine against pasteurellosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pleural fluid was aspirated from caesarean-derived colostrum-deprived, specific pathogen-free (SPF) lambs with experimental pneumonic pasteurellosis [4]. Up to 400 ml of the fluid was collected in a glass bottle containing 2 ml of 100 ~tM-EDTA to prevent the formation of fibrin clots.…”
Section: Collection Of P Haemolytica From Pleural Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Presence of pleurisy was scored between 0 and 3; 0 = no pleurisy and 3 being most severe. The gross lesions along the respiratory tract were described following visual examination and palpation before they were scored 16,17 . Briefly, no significant lesions = 0, 5–10% lung surface affected considered mild and scored 1 point, 11–25% considered moderate and scored 2 points and over 25% considered severe and scored 3 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gross lesions along the respiratory tract were described following visual examination and palpation before they were scored. 16,17 Briefly, no significant lesions = 0, 5-10% lung surface affected considered mild and scored 1 point, 11-25% considered moderate and scored 2 points and over 25% considered severe and scored 3 points. The gastrointestinal tract was examined in a similar manner from the esophagus to the rectum and scored accordingly (0 represents no significant lesion and 3 represents most severe gross lesion).…”
Section: Post-mortem Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%