2015
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental illumination of natural habitat—an experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition

Abstract: Artificial night-time illumination of natural habitats has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Generally, studies that assess the impact of artificial light on various species in the wild make use of existing illumination and are therefore correlative. Moreover, studies mostly focus on short-term consequences at the individual level, rather than long-term consequences at the population and community level—thereby ignoring possible unknown cascading effects in ecosystems. The recent change to LED … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
149
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our working hypothesis is that artificial light will change the bat assemblage foraging at the lit site compared with the assemblage foraging at the dark site. Specifically, we predict that foraging activity of bats such as Pipistrellus pipistrellus that also inhabit urban areas will increase at the lit site compared with the dark control site because of the aggregation of insects around artificial light [26,57,58]. In contrast, bats with a more rural distribution pattern, such as Pipistrellus nathusii should be less abundant at the lit than at the dark site since they are generally more light-averse.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Bats As a Group Of Obligatory Nocturnal Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our working hypothesis is that artificial light will change the bat assemblage foraging at the lit site compared with the assemblage foraging at the dark site. Specifically, we predict that foraging activity of bats such as Pipistrellus pipistrellus that also inhabit urban areas will increase at the lit site compared with the dark control site because of the aggregation of insects around artificial light [26,57,58]. In contrast, bats with a more rural distribution pattern, such as Pipistrellus nathusii should be less abundant at the lit than at the dark site since they are generally more light-averse.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Bats As a Group Of Obligatory Nocturnal Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For highly mobile organisms whose home range is larger than one or both fields, our setup may not be suitable for testing certain hypotheses because of scale-dependence. Studies of long-term effects that require sustained illumination of treatment sites could be carried out using additional sites (not yet planned) or through collaboration with other infrastructures [26,27]. Here, we describe the study area and the newly constructed infrastructure including a characterization of the illumination with photometric measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each site contained four, 100 m-long transects with five 4 m tall lampposts; each transect emanating either LED light (red, white or green) or no light as a dark control treatment [13]. The order of the transects was randomly assigned per site.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Sites And Standard Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the largest is a field experiment in the Netherlands, where eight locations in nature reserves and dark places host several rows of street lamps. The rows are different colours -green, red, white and a control row turned off -and run from a grassland or heath field into a forest 7 . For six years now, scientists and volunteers have used camera traps to monitor the activity of small mammals; automatic bat detectors to record echolocation calls; mist nets for trapping birds; and nest boxes to assess the timing and success of breeding.…”
Section: Ecosystem Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%