2018
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2018.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Gastric Non-Balloon Devices

Abstract: Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are promising alternatives to the conventional surgeries used to treat obesity and related metabolic conditions, targeting gastrointestinal anatomical and physiological processes. Many EBTs are at various stages of development and are aimed at promoting an early sense of satiety via anatomical and physiological mechanisms. In the present study, we focused on relevant clinical issues and future perspectives with regard to gastric non-balloon methods treating obesity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obesity is a major public health concern globally and is linked to various metabolic and psychological problems, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disorders. Endoscopic bariatric therapies, including intragastric balloons, endoscopic suturing devices, full sense devices, and bypass liners, have been developed as alternatives to bariatric surgery for high-risk obese patients and those who refuse surgery. Recently, a new version named the intragastric satiety-inducing device (ISD) was developed and evaluated in rat and porcine models. The ISD reduced food intake and suppressed weight gain with reduced ghrelin hormone levels . However, device-related esophagogastric reflux, a high risk of migration into the stomach, and device-induced reversible inflammatory reaction with tissue hyperplasia were reported. , Although antimigration designs (i.e., barbs, flaps, and antireflux valves) were applied, these device-related complications were still inevitable …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity is a major public health concern globally and is linked to various metabolic and psychological problems, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep disorders. Endoscopic bariatric therapies, including intragastric balloons, endoscopic suturing devices, full sense devices, and bypass liners, have been developed as alternatives to bariatric surgery for high-risk obese patients and those who refuse surgery. Recently, a new version named the intragastric satiety-inducing device (ISD) was developed and evaluated in rat and porcine models. The ISD reduced food intake and suppressed weight gain with reduced ghrelin hormone levels . However, device-related esophagogastric reflux, a high risk of migration into the stomach, and device-induced reversible inflammatory reaction with tissue hyperplasia were reported. , Although antimigration designs (i.e., barbs, flaps, and antireflux valves) were applied, these device-related complications were still inevitable …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of EBT procedures is extensive, reflecting how serious the problem of obesity is. In our discussion, we benefit of a number of excellent reviews [147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155] covering the vast literature dedicated to the EBT techniques and devices. As compared to other devices routinely inserted in the GI tract, those specific to EBTs should be most exposed to biocompatibility-related effects.…”
Section: Biomaterials In Endoscopic Bariatric Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while eliminating surgery-related complications and improving patient quality of life [5][6][7][8][9]. These alternative therapies include endoscopic bariatric therapies using intragastric balloons, endoscopic suturing devices, and bypass liners [10][11][12][13]; however, high costs, high risk of adverse events, and low patient acceptance are major concerns [14][15][16]. Because the fundus of the stomach is the major site for producing ghrelin (the hunger hormone), two types of self-expandable, metallic stent-based devices, i.e., full-sense devices and intragastric satiety-inducing devices (ISDs), inhibit ghrelin production by applying physical pressure on the fundus and cardia [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%