2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evolution with an insect model reveals that male homosexual behaviour occurs due to inaccurate mate choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess impacts within the relevant context of sperm competition, we measured how heatwave conditions influenced a male’s subsequent ability to win fertilisations within females that had previously been mated to untreated, marker males. Males were sexed as pupae, and then isolated from eclosion until experimental mating to standardise and prevent any confounds from uncontrolled same-sex behaviour activity 69 . Treatment males were exposed to 5 days at 30 °C (controls) or 42 °C (heatwaves), followed by 24 h at 30 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess impacts within the relevant context of sperm competition, we measured how heatwave conditions influenced a male’s subsequent ability to win fertilisations within females that had previously been mated to untreated, marker males. Males were sexed as pupae, and then isolated from eclosion until experimental mating to standardise and prevent any confounds from uncontrolled same-sex behaviour activity 69 . Treatment males were exposed to 5 days at 30 °C (controls) or 42 °C (heatwaves), followed by 24 h at 30 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males sexed as pupae were individually isolated before their mating behaviour assay to prevent any same-sex activity and to standardise all individuals prior to each trial 64 , 69 . At adult maturity, males were exposed for 5-day treatments at 30 °C ( n = 25), 39 °C ( n = 24), 40 °C ( n = 21), 41 °C ( n = 24) or 42 °C ( n = 14), followed by 24 h at 30 °C (Supplementary Figure 4c ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural mating disruption (high rates of FMF on crowded host plants) can arise due to: (1) males being unable to discriminate receptive females from conspecific males or non receptive females (Richerson et al, 1976;Takeuchi, 2017;Sales et al, 2018), (2) passive olfactory signals of post reproductive conspecifics interfering with mate location (Gwynne & Lorch, 2013;Rhainds, 2018), or (3) adsorption of pheromone onto the foliage of host plants (Noldus et al, 1991). Testing these hypotheses requires small-scale mapping of female mating probability among georeferenced plants (van Wijk et al, 2017;Muniz et al, 2018;Sciarretta et al, 2018).…”
Section: Signal Interference and Natural Mating Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSB is often considered a result of mistaken identity [39][40][41] , as is suggested to account for about 80% of reported cases in arthropods 3 . Our model provides an evolutionary perspective on this mistaken identity hypothesis, suggesting that poor sex identification could actually occur as an optimal strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%