2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evolution of the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae yields insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying adaptation

Abstract: Understanding how changes in DNA drive the emergence of new phenotypes and fuel evolution remains a major challenge. One major hurdle is the lack of a fossil record of DNA that allows linking mutations to phenotypic changes. However, the emergence of high-throughput sequencing technologies now allows sequencing genomes of natural and experimentally evolved microbial populations to study how mutations arise and spread through a population, how new phenotypes arise and how this ultimately leads to adaptation. He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesized that changes in the regulation of FLO1 cause the flocculation phenotype in nearly all of the evolved clones, and that deleting FLO1 would be a promising route for slowing the evolution of flocculation. Deleting a combination of FLO genes has been previously employed as a method to try to make laboratory strains easier to work with over long-term experimental evolution (Voordeckers and Verstrepen 2015), and modification of the FLO1 promoter has been effectively employed in biological circuits controlling flocculation (Ellis et al 2009); however, it is unknown if specifically deleting FLO1 would be effective on its own. We constructed a flo1 strain, and evolved 32 chemostat vessels of wild type, concurrently with 32 chemostat vessels of the flo1 knockout strain, in glucose limited medium, for >250 generations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that changes in the regulation of FLO1 cause the flocculation phenotype in nearly all of the evolved clones, and that deleting FLO1 would be a promising route for slowing the evolution of flocculation. Deleting a combination of FLO genes has been previously employed as a method to try to make laboratory strains easier to work with over long-term experimental evolution (Voordeckers and Verstrepen 2015), and modification of the FLO1 promoter has been effectively employed in biological circuits controlling flocculation (Ellis et al 2009); however, it is unknown if specifically deleting FLO1 would be effective on its own. We constructed a flo1 strain, and evolved 32 chemostat vessels of wild type, concurrently with 32 chemostat vessels of the flo1 knockout strain, in glucose limited medium, for >250 generations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, CCNV offers a fast way to modify gene copy number during natural evolution of eukaryotes and to increase evolvability by allowing neofunctionalization of amplified essential genes (51, 9496). Under selective conditions, mutants with CCNV will outgrow the parental population whenever positive effects of CCNV on fitness outweigh any negative impacts of AASR, while further mutations that enhance positive effects or decrease AASR can further increase the initial fitness benefit.…”
Section: Ccnv In Evolutionary Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches are limited to identifying only a subset of high frequency and easy to sequence mutations. Moreover, separating the adaptive mutations from those that are merely hitchhiking remains a challenge (Voordeckers and Verstrepen, 2015). For example, in many studies the sequenced clones were isolated after hundreds or thousands of generations to ensure the presence of adaptive mutations, resulting in multiple mutations per clone (Barrick et al, 2009; Kryazhimskiy et al, 2014; Tenaillon et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%