2009
DOI: 10.1038/nature08504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evolution of bet hedging

Abstract: Bet hedging-stochastic switching between phenotypic states-is a canonical example of an evolutionary adaptation that facilitates persistence in the face of fluctuating environmental conditions. Although bet hedging is found in organisms ranging from bacteria to humans, direct evidence for an adaptive origin of this behaviour is lacking. Here we report the de novo evolution of bet hedging in experimental bacterial populations. Bacteria were subjected to an environment that continually favoured new phenotypic st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
552
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(576 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
15
552
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in bacterial persistence, populations are bimodal, maintaining a small subpopulation of dormant cells in addition to normally growing cells (11). This type of bet-hedging has been evolved in Pseudomonas fluorescens in the presence of alternating stresses (12,13). 2) An alternative approach is to generate a continuum of stress-resistance levels within a population, which we refer to as a ''unimodal distribution''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in bacterial persistence, populations are bimodal, maintaining a small subpopulation of dormant cells in addition to normally growing cells (11). This type of bet-hedging has been evolved in Pseudomonas fluorescens in the presence of alternating stresses (12,13). 2) An alternative approach is to generate a continuum of stress-resistance levels within a population, which we refer to as a ''unimodal distribution''.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our knowledge of the prevalence of bet‐hedging strategies is improving (Beaumont, Gallie, Kost, Ferguson, & Rainey, 2009; Graham, Smith, & Simons, 2014; Simons, 2011), our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the generation of diversification and of the joint expression of these two modes of response is underdeveloped.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, neutral evolution associated with synonymous mutations was less frequent, indicating that selection for adaptation is the dominant evolutionary dynamic under these conditions. Similarly, after alternating cycles of static and aerated growth, Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolved adaptability as manifested by an ability to reversibly generate variants that were particularly suitable for each of the two environments [29]. Laboratory experiments often select for the so-called mutators, in which the general frequency of genetic variants is elevated [28,30].…”
Section: Darwinian Selection During Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%