Experimental evidence that ecological effects of an invasive fish are reduced at high densities

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between invasive species density and ecological impact is a pressing topic in ecology, with implications for environmental management and policy. Although it is widely assumed that invasive species impact will increase with density, theory suggests interspecific competition may diminish at high densities due to increased intraspecific interactions. To test this theory, we experimentally examined intra- and interspecific interactions between a globally invasive fish, round goby (Neogobius melanostomus), and three native species at different round goby densities in a tributary of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Eighteen 2.25 m2 enclosures were stocked with native fish species at natural abundances, while round gobies were stocked at three different densities: 0 m−2, 2.7 m−2, and 10.7 m−2. After 52 days, native fish growth rate was significantly reduced in the low density goby treatment, while growth in the high density goby treatment mirrored the goby-free treatment for two of three native species. Invertebrate density and gut content weight of native fishes did not differ among treatments. Conversely, gut content weight and growth of round gobies were lower in the high goby density treatment, suggesting interactions between round gobies and native fishes are mediated by interference competition amongst gobies. Our experiment provides evidence that invasive species effects may diminish at high densities, possibly due to increased intraspecific interactions. This is consistent with some ecological theory, and cautions against the assumption that invasive species at moderate densities have low impact.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-014-2899-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Negative competitive effects of invasive plants change with time since invasion

“…Higher abundance levels may also contribute to higher impacts measured at more established sites; however, only two of the six correlative studies reported higher abundances with time since invasion (Mitchell et al 2011, Brandner et al 2013. Furthermore, high abundances of an invader can, in some cases, lead to reduced ecological impacts owing to interference competition (Kornis et al 2014). Long-term studies measuring invader abundance and community responses over time are required to tease apart the contribution of per capita effects and abundance to overall ecological impact.…”

“…For instance, invasive plant growth has been found to be more suppressed by negative soil feedbacks with time since invasion (Diez et al 2010). Abundance of the invader will also change over time, though the relationship between invader abundance and impact may increase (Thomsen et al 2011) or decrease linearly (Kornis et al 2014), or have a non-linear relationship, depending on the response being measured (Yokomizo et al 2009, Jackson et al 2015. Changes in impacts over time are not well understood as most impact studies are conducted for less than a year, and 40% of studies do not report the time since invasion of their study organism (Strayer et al 2006).…”

Density-impact functions for terrestrial vertebrate pests and indigenous biota: Guidelines for conservation managers

“…1 (although other functions are possible, e.g. Kornis et al, 2014). Technically, impacts can be either positive or negative.…”

The effects of the diel cycle and the density of an invasive predator on predation risk and prey response

“…It would be valuable to further extend this study to reflect the natural temporal variation in both P. australiensis and G. holbrooki densities as has been observed in the field (Pyke, 2008;Walsh & Mitchell, 1998). As such, the existence of multiple interactions may make coexistence between these species more challenging and suggests that traditional management techniques for invasive species, including reducing densities, may prove to be ineffective (Kornis, Carlson, Lehrer-Brey, & Vander Zanden, 2014;Mills, Rader, & Belk, 2004).…”