2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Biodiversity Conservation Videos on Charitable Donations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
3
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the AHC narrative influenced people’s willingness to support conservation policies, especially commercial wildlife trade bans. This is in line with both the outrage effect (Kahneman et al 1993 ; Bulte et al 2005 ; Shreedhar and Mourato 2019 ) and the predicted impact of responsibilizing narratives (Bénabou et al 2018 ). We found that the AHC narrative increased the feeling that firms and governments were responsible, but had no significant effect on personal responsibility, which is only partially in line with the responsibility effect (Walker et al 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that the AHC narrative influenced people’s willingness to support conservation policies, especially commercial wildlife trade bans. This is in line with both the outrage effect (Kahneman et al 1993 ; Bulte et al 2005 ; Shreedhar and Mourato 2019 ) and the predicted impact of responsibilizing narratives (Bénabou et al 2018 ). We found that the AHC narrative increased the feeling that firms and governments were responsible, but had no significant effect on personal responsibility, which is only partially in line with the responsibility effect (Walker et al 1999 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Kahneman et al ( 1993 ) termed this the ‘outrage effect’ because they found that people reported human-caused harm as more upsetting than unintentional harm. More recently, Shreedhar and Mourato ( 2019 ) found evidence for the outrage effect on wildlife conservation donations. They found that subjects increased donations after exposure to audio-visual narratives causally linking wildlife loss to human causes like poaching and habitat loss, compared to a control group omitting this causal information from the narrative.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent examples of experimental environmental research stem from Zelenski et al (2015) [17], Janpol and Dilts (2016) [18], Shreedhar and Mourato (2019) [19], and Jacobson et al (2019) [20]. Zelenski et al (2015) [17] conducted three in-lab randomized experiments showing students nature documentary films versus architectural videos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former also more often donated a one-dollar voucher to a "save the dolphins fund" than did the latter (95% versus 60%). Shreedhar and Mourato (2019) [19] investigate the effect of biodiversity videos on charitable giving. They designed different visual material (sequences of photos which were voiced over) containing either bats or lions or both, and information on the human cause of their endangerment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menurut riset, diantara semua generasi, generasi milenial adalah generasi yang paling konsumtif (Sullivan dan Heitmeyer 2008). Namun, generasi ini memiliki kesadaran sosial yang tinggi (Sheahan 2005, Koczanski & Rosen, 2019. Mereka sangat terlibat di sosial media, sehingga sangat berpotensi mendukung aktivitas sosial (Paulin, Ferguson, Jost, Fallu, 2014).…”
unclassified