2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2012.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of the validity of Bahe–Varela theory to describe the volumetric properties of ionic liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, numerous fundamental studies have investigated [EMIm][EtSO 4 ] and its mixtures with other substances. Most of these efforts focused on the aqueous and alcoholic solutions, see for example References , and the mixtures with organic solvents, polymers, and gases . Even a few studies of the RTIL inside nano‐porous and meso‐porous materials were reported …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, numerous fundamental studies have investigated [EMIm][EtSO 4 ] and its mixtures with other substances. Most of these efforts focused on the aqueous and alcoholic solutions, see for example References , and the mixtures with organic solvents, polymers, and gases . Even a few studies of the RTIL inside nano‐porous and meso‐porous materials were reported …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theoretical model has also been chosen because of its physical meaning, in contrast to the Redlich−Kister model, which is an empirical correlation. Equation 15 was used to determine the V 1 ∞ values by Bahe−Varela 60 as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison purposes, the partial molar volumes of the IL at infinite dilution, V 1 ∞ , have been also calculated with the Bahe–Varela model, , and the results are shown in Table S23 of the Supporting Information. This theoretical model has also been chosen because of its physical meaning, in contrast to the Redlich–Kister model, which is an empirical correlation.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation